Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
**Status**: π‘ In Progress
# Phase 1.1 Evaluation Framework - Progress Report
**Date**: 2025-11-08
**Status**: π‘ In Progress
## Completed Tasks β
### 1. Evaluation Directory Structure
Created complete evaluation framework at `opennotebook/evaluation/`:
```
evaluation/
βββ README.md # Complete usage documentation
βββ requirements.txt # Python dependencies
βββ PROGRESS.md # This file
βββ golden_set.json # Generated Q&A dataset (in progress)
βββ golden_set_builder.py # Gemini-based Q&A generator
βββ ragas_evaluator.py # RAGAS metrics implementation
βββ trulens_monitor.py # TruLens RAG Triad monitor
βββ benchmark_suite.py # End-to-end benchmark runner
βββ evaluation_results/ # Output directory (created on first run)
```
### 2. Dependencies Installed
```bash
β
ragas>=0.1.0
β
datasets>=2.14.0
β
requests>=2.31.0
β
loguru>=0.7.0
```
Note: TruLens is optional (requires OPENAI_API_KEY for evaluation)
### 3. Golden Set Generation (In Progress)
**Script**: `golden_set_builder.py`
**Target**: 100 Q&A pairs from diverse sutras
**Current Status**: ~20/100 questions generated (4 sutras)
**Features**:
- Uses Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental for high-quality generation
- Generates 5 questions per sutra across 3 categories:
- Factual (μ¬μ€): Direct content questions
- Interpretive (ν΄μ): Meaning and interpretation
- Practical (μ€μ²): Practice and application
- Auto-checkpoint saves progress after each sutra
- Handles rate limits gracefully
- Estimated completion time: ~5-10 minutes total
**Rate Limit Handling**:
The script is encountering 429 errors from Gemini API (quota: 300 req/min). This is expected and handled by:
- 1.5 second delay between requests
- Continuing with other sutras on failure
- Auto-saving progress
- Will complete as quota resets
## Next Steps π
### Phase 1.1 Remaining
1. β³ **Complete Golden Set** (ETA: ~10 minutes)
- Wait for builder to finish 100 Q&A pairs
- Verify quality and distribution
2. π **Run Baseline Benchmark**
- Ensure RAG server is running
- Execute `benchmark_suite.py`
- Measure current system performance:
- Context Precision (retrieval accuracy)
- Context Recall (retrieval completeness)
- Faithfulness (hallucination detection)
- Answer Relevancy (response quality)
### Phase 1.2 - Reranker Integration
After baseline is established:
- Install `ms-marco-MiniLM-L-12-v2` reranker
- Integrate with LangChain `ContextualCompressionRetriever`
- Re-run benchmark with `experiment_name="with_reranker"`
- Compare improvements
### Phase 1.3 - Anti-Hallucination Prompt
- Strengthen prompt with explicit groundedness instructions
- Add "don't guess" guardrails
- Measure Faithfulness improvement
## System Architecture
### Current RAG Pipeline (Baseline)
```
User Query
β
Vector Search (ChromaDB)
ββ Embedding: bert-ancient-chinese-finetuned
ββ Collection: cbeta_sutras_finetuned (99,723 docs)
ββ Retrieval: top_k=10 (or 20 with sutra filter)
β
LLM Generation (Gemini 2.0 Flash)
β
Answer + Sources
```
### Phase 1.2 Target Architecture (With Reranker)
```
User Query
β
Vector Search (ChromaDB) β top_k=20
β
Reranker (MiniLM-L-12-v2) β top_k=10
ββ Filters irrelevant contexts
ββ Improves precision
β
LLM Generation
β
Answer + Sources (higher quality)
```
## Evaluation Methodology
### RAGAS Metrics
Each metric scored 0-1 (higher is better):
1. **Context Precision**: Retrieved contexts relevance to question
- Baseline target: 0.60
- Phase 1 goal: 0.75 (+25%)
2. **Context Recall**: Ground truth coverage in contexts
- Baseline target: 0.65
- Phase 1 goal: 0.80 (+23%)
3. **Faithfulness**: Answer grounding in contexts (anti-hallucination)
- Baseline target: 0.80
- Phase 1 goal: 0.90 (+12%)
4. **Answer Relevancy**: Answer relevance to question
- Baseline target: 0.70
- Phase 1 goal: 0.85 (+21%)
### Benchmark Process
1. Load golden set (100 Q&A pairs)
2. Query RAG system for each question
3. Extract answer + retrieved contexts
4. Compare with ground truth
5. Calculate RAGAS metrics
6. Save results to `evaluation_results/`
## Usage Commands
### Check Golden Set Progress
```bash
cd evaluation
tail -f ../source_explorer/source_data/golden_set_builder.log
# Or check the file directly:
wc -l golden_set.json
```
### Run Baseline Benchmark (After Golden Set Complete)
```bash
# Terminal 1: Ensure server is running
cd /Users/vairocana/Desktop/buddhakorea/buddha-korea-notebook-exp/opennotebook
python main.py
# Terminal 2: Run benchmark
cd evaluation
python benchmark_suite.py
```
### View Results
```bash
cd evaluation_results
ls -lt # List results by modification time
cat benchmark_baseline_v1_*.json | jq '.ragas_scores'
```
## Success Criteria for Phase 1.1
- β
Evaluation framework created
- β
Dependencies installed
- β³ Golden set with 100 Q&A pairs
- β³ Baseline benchmark completed
- β³ All 4 RAGAS metrics measured
- β³ Results saved and documented
**Overall Phase 1.1 Completion**: ~70%
## Known Issues
### Rate Limiting (429 Errors)
**Impact**: Slower golden set generation
**Workaround**: Script auto-retries and continues with other sutras
**Solution**: None needed - will resolve automatically
### TruLens Optional
**Impact**: TruLens monitoring requires OPENAI_API_KEY
**Workaround**: Use RAGAS only for now
**Solution**: Set `export OPENAI_API_KEY=xxx` if you want TruLens dashboard
## Files Created (Phase 1.1)
| File | Lines | Purpose |
|------|-------|---------|
| `golden_set_builder.py` | 270 | Generate Q&A from CBETA summaries |
| `ragas_evaluator.py` | 170 | RAGAS evaluation implementation |
| `trulens_monitor.py` | 180 | TruLens monitoring (optional) |
| `benchmark_suite.py` | 300 | End-to-end benchmark orchestration |
| `README.md` | 250 | Complete usage documentation |
| `requirements.txt` | 10 | Python dependencies |
| `golden_set.json` | - | Generated Q&A dataset |
**Total New Code**: ~1,200 lines
**Total Documentation**: ~500 lines
---
**Updated**: 2025-11-08 14:55 KST
**Next Update**: After golden set completion
- Without a harness, you **can't compare** prompts, models, retrieval configs, or costs.
Evaluate, benchmark, and regression-test AI/LLM systems. Covers evaluation framework design, benchmark creation, human evaluation protocols, automated evaluation (LLM-as-judge), regression testing, statistical significance, and continuous evaluation pipelines.
<img width="1388" height="298" alt="full_diagram" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12a2371b-8be2-4219-9b48-90503eb43c69" />
A list of all public EEG-datasets. This list of EEG-resources is not exhaustive. If you find something new, or have explored any unfiltered link in depth, please update the repository.