/godmode:eval
Generates a full evaluation pipeline for AI systems: datasets, judge prompts, regression tests, and reports.
What this file does
Generates a full evaluation pipeline for AI systems: datasets, judge prompts, regression tests, and reports.
When to use it
- Need to benchmark an LLM or RAG system
- Setting up automated regression tests for AI outputs
- Comparing two model versions or providers
- Creating a human evaluation protocol with annotator training
Assumes this stack
/godmode:eval
Evaluate, benchmark, and regression-test AI/LLM systems. Covers evaluation framework design, benchmark creation, human evaluation protocols, automated evaluation (LLM-as-judge), regression testing, statistical significance, and continuous evaluation pipelines.
Usage
/godmode:eval # Full evaluation workflow
/godmode:eval --dataset # Create or manage evaluation dataset
/godmode:eval --judge # Set up LLM-as-judge evaluation
/godmode:eval --human # Set up human evaluation protocol
/godmode:eval --benchmark # Create reusable benchmark
/godmode:eval --regression # Set up or run regression tests
/godmode:eval --compare <a> <b> # Compare two systems or versions
/godmode:eval --report # Generate report from existing results
/godmode:eval --ci # Generate CI/CD integration
/godmode:eval --calibrate # Calibrate LLM judge vs human scores
/godmode:eval --significance # Run statistical significance analysis
/godmode:eval --history # Show evaluation trends
/godmode:eval --quick # Lightweight eval (golden set only)
/godmode:eval --full # Comprehensive eval (all categories)
What It Does
- Discovers what AI system needs evaluation, quality dimensions, and evaluation budget
- Designs evaluation dataset from golden sets, production logs, synthetic, adversarial, and regression examples
- Selects evaluation framework (RAGAS, DeepEval, Promptfoo, LangSmith, Braintrust, custom)
- Designs LLM-as-judge with scoring rubrics, calibration, and bias mitigation
- Designs human evaluation protocol with annotator training, agreement measurement, and adjudication
- Creates reusable benchmarks with categories, weighting, and baseline scores
- Builds regression test suite from production failures that runs in CI/CD
- Runs statistical significance tests (bootstrap, McNemar, Wilcoxon) with confidence intervals
- Generates evaluation config, dataset, judge prompts, regression tests, and report
Output
- Evaluation config at
evals/<system>/eval-config.yaml - Dataset at
evals/<system>/dataset/ - Judge prompts at
evals/<system>/judges/ - Regression tests at
evals/<system>/regression/ - Results at
evals/<system>/results/ - Report at
docs/evals/<system>-eval-report.md - Commit:
"eval: <system> — v<version>, <N> examples, correctness=<val>, faithfulness=<val>"
Next Step
After evaluation: /godmode:prompt to fix prompt issues, /godmode:rag to improve retrieval, /godmode:agent to fix agent issues, or /godmode:ship to deploy if metrics pass.
Examples
/godmode:eval Evaluate our customer support RAG chatbot
/godmode:eval --judge Compare GPT-4 vs Claude on summarization
/godmode:eval --regression Set up regression tests for our AI pipeline
/godmode:eval --benchmark Create a benchmark for our classification task
/godmode:eval --compare v2.0 v2.1 Is the new version better?
/godmode:eval --calibrate Calibrate our LLM judge against human ratings
What's inside
14 CLI flags, 9 output artifacts, 9 workflow steps, and 6 example commands.
Change this for your project
- Replace
evals/<system>/paths with your own system name - Replace
docs/evals/<system>-eval-report.mdwith your report path - Replace commit message template
"eval: <system>, v<version>, <N> examples, correctness=<val>, faithfulness=<val>"with your metrics
Where it goes
Keep alongside your test suite. Used to define and score model evaluations.
Worth borrowing
- Separates evaluation config, datasets, judge prompts, and regression tests into distinct directories
- Includes a calibration step to align LLM judge scores with human ratings
- Provides both quick (golden set only) and full (all categories) evaluation modes
Related Documents
AI Tools for Developers
Curates a personal reference of AI coding tools, models, and setup instructions for VS Code, Xcode, and Cursor.
Evaluating AI Agent Systems: Metrics, Benchmarks, and Quality Assurance (2024-2026)
Surveys 2024-2026 metrics, benchmarks, and monitoring tools for evaluating AI agent systems, with recommendations for a self-improving coding agent.
IATA BCBP Standard Compliance
Documents which IATA BCBP fields and barcode formats a Swift library implements, including Version 8 gender code support.
Voice AI Leaderboards, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Gaps (Jan 2025 -- Feb 2026)
Surveys 20+ voice AI benchmarks from Jan 2025, Feb 2026, identifies evaluation gaps, and provides leaderboard data for STT, TTS, and end-to-end voice agents.