MCP Server Audit - TODO and Future Improvements
Lists over 100 planned features, improvements, and research items for an MCP server security audit tool, organised by priority and area.
What this file does
Lists over 100 planned features, improvements, and research items for an MCP server security audit tool, organised by priority and area.
When to use it
- Prioritising backlog items for an MCP security tool
- Planning a security audit framework for MCP servers
- Identifying gaps in an existing MCP security assessment workflow
- Structuring community contributions around a security tool
MCP Server Audit - TODO and Future Improvements
Immediate Priorities
Proof of Concept Demonstration
Priority: Critical
- Create complete end-to-end walkthrough showing full audit process on real MCP server
- Develop "Try It Now" 5-minute demo with copy-paste commands
- Document sample MCP server audit finding multiple security issues with AIVSS scoring
- Create vulnerability-db submission process documentation and examples
- Build step-by-step guide demonstrating prompt usage and expected outputs
- Show before/after security improvements from audit findings
- Create sample vulnerability reports with both CVSS and AARS scoring examples
System Validation and Examples
Priority: High
- Conduct end-to-end testing of security assessment workflow on real MCP servers
- Create usage examples showing command patterns and expected outcomes
- Test prompts with actual users to validate educational effectiveness
- Document common user pain points and workflow friction
- Create video or step-by-step walkthrough demonstrations
Additional Security Checks Development
Priority: High
- Input validation security check (CWE-20: Improper Input Validation)
- Authentication security check (CWE-287: Improper Authentication)
- SQL injection security check (CWE-89: SQL Injection)
- Path traversal security check (CWE-22: Path Traversal)
- Code injection security check (CWE-94: Code Injection)
- Cross-site scripting check (CWE-79: XSS) for web-based servers
- Unsafe deserialization check (CWE-502: Deserialization)
- AI-specific prompt injection security check
- MCP protocol security check (transport, message validation)
- Dependency vulnerability security check (supply chain)
Usage Examples and Documentation
Priority: High
- Add usage examples to main README.md
- Create examples for each prompt type (security assessment, targeted evaluation, discovery)
- Document expected command patterns and file paths
- Create troubleshooting guide for common issues
- Add screenshots or terminal output examples
Quality Control System for Security Checks
Priority: High
- Develop meta-prompts for AI check creation guidance
- Create check validation framework to prevent low-quality checks
- Establish check review process (peer review, testing against known servers)
- Define check retirement criteria for outdated or ineffective checks
- Implement check versioning and changelog system
Check Testing Framework
Priority: High
- Create test cases for each check using known good/bad MCP servers
- Develop automated testing pipeline for check effectiveness
- Build validation datasets of MCP servers with known security characteristics
- Establish metrics for check accuracy (false positive/negative rates)
- Create check calibration process using community feedback
System Architecture Improvements
Implement Audit Exceptions Framework
Priority: High
- Create
mcpserver-audit/exceptions/directory for structured exception definitions (YAML files). - Design the schema for exception files, including
check_id,justification,scope(paths), andstatus. - Create a new
prompts/exception-handling.mdprompt to guide the AI on how to process and apply these exceptions. - Update the main audit workflow to consult the exceptions framework before reporting a finding.
- Add a "Suppressed Findings" section to the final audit report format.
- Create the first exception rule for "Hardcoded Placeholder Keys in Test Files" as a proof-of-concept.
Formalize Workflow Architecture
Priority: Medium
- Investigate promoting the
WORKFLOW.mdconcept into a top-level/workflowsdirectory. - Define a schema for workflow files that orchestrate personas, frameworks, and skills.
Progressive Disclosure Implementation
Priority: Medium
- Implement skill-level assessment mechanism
- Create user experience pathways (novice/intermediate/advanced)
- Develop adaptive check selection based on user skill level
- Build learning progress tracking system
- Create skill-appropriate check complexity levels
Community Intelligence System
Priority: Medium
- Develop server reputation tracking system
- Create community feedback aggregation mechanism
- Build security incident tracking database
- Implement server adoption and usage pattern analysis
- Create ecosystem health monitoring dashboard
Demo and Integration Infrastructure
Priority: High
- Create sample "vulnerable MCP server" for demonstration purposes
- Build vulnerability-db integration workflow and submission templates
- Develop quick-start documentation with real examples showing multiple findings per audit
- Create pre-filled prompt templates users can copy-paste to try immediately
- Build expected results documentation so users know if they're doing it right
- Develop "common audit scenarios" with typical multi-issue findings
- Create integration examples showing audit → vulnerability-db → community benefit workflow
Security Examples Library Development
Priority: Medium
- Collect real-world MCP server security examples (good and bad patterns)
- Create anonymized security case studies from actual assessments
- Build searchable security examples database by vulnerability type
- Develop security example maintenance and update process
- Create security example contribution guidelines for community
Advanced Security Analysis Features
Deep Security Assessment Capabilities
Priority: Medium-High
- Data Flow Analysis: Analyze MCP servers to construct data flow diagrams showing how sensitive information moves through the system
- Automated Threat Modeling: Generate threat models for MCP servers based on their capabilities and data handling
- Authentication Analysis: Deep dive into authentication mechanisms, token scoping, and access control patterns
- API Security Review: Analyze external APIs used by servers for proper scoping, rate limiting, and security controls
- Permission Boundary Analysis: Map out what permissions servers request vs. what they actually need
- Network Security Assessment: Analyze network communication patterns, encryption, and potential data leakage
- Input/Output Validation: Comprehensive analysis of data sanitization and validation practices
- State Management Security: Review how servers handle session state, caching, and persistent data
- Error Handling Analysis: Assess information disclosure through error messages and logging
- Resource Exhaustion Testing: Identify potential DoS vectors and resource management issues
AI-Powered Security Discovery
Priority: Medium
- Behavioral Pattern Analysis: Use AI to identify suspicious or unusual server behaviors
- Code Similarity Analysis: Detect code reuse patterns that might indicate copied vulnerabilities
- Security Anti-Pattern Detection: Train models to recognize insecure coding patterns specific to MCP servers
- Contextual Risk Assessment: AI analysis of security risks based on server's intended use case
- Emerging Threat Detection: Pattern recognition for novel attack vectors not covered by existing CVEs
Advanced Automated Analysis
Priority: Medium
- Develop CI/CD integration for security checks
- Create GitHub Action for automated MCP server security scanning
- Build dependency vulnerability scanning integration
- Implement code pattern analysis automation
- Create security scorecard generation system
- Runtime Security Analysis: Dynamic analysis of servers during execution
- Container Security Assessment: Docker/containerization security analysis
- Supply Chain Deep Analysis: Advanced dependency tree analysis and risk assessment
Security Integration Enhancements
Priority: Low
- Deep integration with
audit-dbfor historical security data - Enhanced
vulnerability-dbcross-referencing - Security-focused
server-dbdata synchronization - Third-party security tool integrations (SAST, DAST, SCA)
- Cloud security platform integrations
Security Assessment User Experience Improvements
Priority: Medium
- Create interactive security assessment wizard
- Develop security assessment report templating system
- Build security assessment comparison and trending features
- Create security assessment sharing and collaboration features
- Implement security assessment scheduling and reminders
Research and Development
Security Research Areas
Priority: Medium
- MCP-specific attack vector research
- Supply chain security analysis for MCP ecosystem
- Container and deployment security best practices research
- Authentication and authorization pattern analysis
- Privacy and data protection requirements research
Methodology Improvements
Priority: Low
- Comparative analysis of different assessment methodologies
- Statistical analysis of assessment effectiveness
- Machine learning approaches for pattern detection
- Behavioral analysis of secure vs. insecure MCP servers
- Cost-benefit analysis of different security measures
Documentation and Training
Security Educational Content Development
Priority: Medium
- Create comprehensive MCP security training curriculum
- Develop video tutorials for security assessment scenarios
- Build interactive security assessment simulations
- Create MCP security awareness training materials
- Develop MCP security assessor certification program
Community Building
Priority: Low
- Establish MCP security working group
- Create regular security assessment workshops
- Build mentorship program for security assessment skills
- Develop conference and presentation materials
- Create community contribution recognition system
Infrastructure and Operations
System Scalability
Priority: Low
- Design distributed assessment capability
- Create assessment result caching and optimization
- Build high-availability deployment architecture
- Implement performance monitoring and alerting
- Create backup and disaster recovery procedures
Compliance and Governance
Priority: Low
- Develop compliance framework alignment (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)
- Create audit trail and logging requirements
- Implement data retention and privacy policies
- Build governance and oversight procedures
- Create legal and regulatory compliance validation
Note: This TODO is a living document that should be updated regularly as priorities shift and new requirements emerge. Items should be moved from TODO to active development as capacity allows.
Last updated: 2025-08-07
What's inside
7 priority sections, 40+ checklist items, 5 architecture subsections, 3 advanced analysis subsections, 2 research subsections, 2 documentation subsections, 2 infrastructure subsections
Change this for your project
- Replace
mcpserver-audit/exceptions/with your own project's exceptions directory path - Replace
prompts/exception-handling.mdwith your own prompt file path - Replace
WORKFLOW.mdwith your own workflow documentation filename
Where it goes
Keep alongside your test suite. Used to define and score model evaluations.
Worth borrowing
- Organises improvements by priority (Critical, High, Medium, Low) and area (Immediate, Architecture, Advanced, Research, Documentation, Infrastructure)
- Includes a proof-of-concept exception framework with schema fields (
check_id,justification,scope,status) - Proposes a progressive disclosure system with skill-level assessment and adaptive check selection
Related Documents
AI Tools for Developers
Curates a personal reference of AI coding tools, models, and setup instructions for VS Code, Xcode, and Cursor.
Evaluating AI Agent Systems: Metrics, Benchmarks, and Quality Assurance (2024-2026)
Surveys 2024-2026 metrics, benchmarks, and monitoring tools for evaluating AI agent systems, with recommendations for a self-improving coding agent.
IATA BCBP Standard Compliance
Documents which IATA BCBP fields and barcode formats a Swift library implements, including Version 8 gender code support.
Voice AI Leaderboards, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Gaps (Jan 2025 -- Feb 2026)
Surveys 20+ voice AI benchmarks from Jan 2025, Feb 2026, identifies evaluation gaps, and provides leaderboard data for STT, TTS, and end-to-end voice agents.