RWKV-Evals
Presents RWKV model benchmark scores across Uncheatable Eval, MMLU, RULER, LongBench, and other tests, with comparison tables against competing models.
What this file does
Presents RWKV model benchmark scores across Uncheatable Eval, MMLU, RULER, LongBench, and other tests, with comparison tables against competing models.
When to use it
- Comparing RWKV performance against other open-source LLMs on standard benchmarks
- Evaluating which RWKV model size fits your accuracy requirements
- Referencing benchmark methodology for your own model evaluation
- Documenting model capabilities in a research or project README
Assumes this stack
RWKV-Evals
RWKV Evaluation Data presents RWKV's performance across various large language model benchmarks, including Uncheatable Eval, MMLU, RULER, and LongBench.
Uncheatable Eval Test
::: tip Uncheatable Eval is an "uncheatable evaluation" that uses real-time data, such as the latest academic papers and news articles, to assess the true modeling capabilities and generalization abilities of open-source large language models.
The result of the Uncheatable Eval test is the compression ratio; therefore, a lower score indicates better model performance. :::
Below is a comparison of Uncheatable Eval scores between RWKV and other models:
14B Parameter Models
| Name | Params (B) | Average (lower=better) | ao3 english | bbc news | wikipedia english | arxiv computer science | arxiv physics | github cpp | github python |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 13.269 | 6.843 | 9.848 | 8.202 | 7.636 | 7.108 | 7.380 | 4.026 | 3.892 |
| Qwen3-14B-Base | 14.768 | 6.845 | 10.569 | 8.445 | 7.942 | 7.001 | 7.210 | 3.439 | 3.312 |
| gemma-3-12b-pt | 12.187 | 6.945 | 10.540 | 7.914 | 7.607 | 7.286 | 7.387 | 3.883 | 3.997 |
| Qwen2.5-14B | 14.770 | 6.951 | 10.558 | 8.317 | 7.944 | 7.224 | 7.392 | 3.625 | 3.599 |
| Mistral-Nemo-Base-2407 | 12.248 | 6.970 | 10.165 | 8.118 | 7.642 | 7.287 | 7.455 | 4.079 | 4.042 |
| Motif-2-12.7B-Base | 12.704 | 7.099 | 10.628 | 8.328 | 7.897 | 7.134 | 7.404 | 4.189 | 4.114 |
| Llama-2-13b-hf | 13.016 | 7.540 | 10.655 | 8.307 | 7.901 | 7.993 | 8.122 | 4.795 | 5.009 |
7B Parameter Models
| Name | Params (B) | Average (lower=better) | ao3 english | bbc news | wikipedia english | arxiv computer science | arxiv physics | github cpp | github python |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-8B-Base | 8.191 | 7.091 | 10.890 | 8.718 | 8.255 | 7.207 | 7.465 | 3.617 | 3.482 |
| Meta-Llama-3-8B | 8.030 | 7.162 | 10.619 | 8.295 | 7.785 | 7.536 | 7.541 | 4.174 | 4.181 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b-20251029-ctx8192 | 7.199 | 7.222 | 10.164 | 8.480 | 7.996 | 7.440 | 7.747 | 4.378 | 4.347 |
| Qwen2.5-7B | 7.616 | 7.323 | 11.079 | 8.729 | 8.449 | 7.539 | 7.792 | 3.868 | 3.806 |
| Falcon-H1-7B-Base | 7.586 | 7.339 | 10.958 | 8.576 | 8.225 | 7.403 | 7.569 | 4.251 | 4.392 |
| Mistral-7B-v0.1 | 7.242 | 7.406 | 10.662 | 8.306 | 7.976 | 7.745 | 7.903 | 4.612 | 4.635 |
| Hunyuan-7B-Pretrain | 7.505 | 7.541 | 11.509 | 8.987 | 8.499 | 7.653 | 8.108 | 4.201 | 3.829 |
| falcon-mamba-7b | 7.273 | 7.548 | 10.760 | 8.958 | 8.589 | 7.674 | 7.737 | 4.437 | 4.680 |
| Zamba2-7B | 7.357 | 7.582 | 10.702 | 8.627 | 8.074 | 7.843 | 8.124 | 4.833 | 4.869 |
| Minitron-8B-Base | 8.272 | 7.582 | 10.835 | 8.654 | 8.284 | 7.856 | 8.230 | 4.508 | 4.708 |
| Olmo-3-1025-7B | 7.298 | 7.595 | 11.101 | 8.784 | 8.522 | 7.490 | 7.947 | 4.930 | 4.394 |
| RWKV-x060-World-7B-v3-20241112-ctx4096 | 7.636 | 7.633 | 10.629 | 8.753 | 8.288 | 7.936 | 8.109 | 4.786 | 4.929 |
3B Parameter Models
| Name | Params (B) | Average (lower=better) | ao3 english | bbc news | wikipedia english | arxiv computer science | arxiv physics | github cpp | github python |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWKV7-g1a4-2.9b-20251118-ctx8192 | 2.948 | 7.486 | 10.481 | 8.800 | 8.310 | 7.712 | 8.072 | 4.553 | 4.474 |
| Llama-3.2-3B | 3.213 | 7.643 | 11.219 | 8.701 | 8.365 | 7.928 | 8.065 | 4.661 | 4.562 |
| Qwen2.5-3B | 3.086 | 7.722 | 11.575 | 9.139 | 8.895 | 7.911 | 8.220 | 4.203 | 4.113 |
| SmolLM3-3B-Base | 3.075 | 7.784 | 11.187 | 8.905 | 8.611 | 8.097 | 8.631 | 4.513 | 4.546 |
| RWKV-x070-World-2.9B-v3-20250211-ctx4096 | 2.948 | 7.800 | 10.812 | 8.909 | 8.501 | 8.049 | 8.307 | 4.955 | 5.066 |
| stablelm-3b-4e1t | 2.795 | 7.907 | 11.211 | 8.815 | 8.434 | 8.299 | 8.476 | 4.906 | 5.207 |
| Falcon-H1-3B-Base | 3.149 | 7.936 | 11.685 | 9.158 | 8.910 | 7.891 | 8.161 | 4.832 | 4.917 |
| recurrentgemma-2b | 2.683 | 8.052 | 11.632 | 8.951 | 8.835 | 8.401 | 8.488 | 4.897 | 5.157 |
| RWKV-x060-World-3B-v2.1-20240417-ctx4096 | 3.100 | 8.147 | 11.005 | 9.161 | 8.815 | 8.451 | 8.559 | 5.479 | 5.561 |
| mamba2attn-2.7b | 2.698 | 8.204 | 11.436 | 9.246 | 8.947 | 8.474 | 8.236 | 5.336 | 5.751 |
1.5B Parameter Models
| Name | Params (B) | Average (lower=better) | ao3 english | bbc news | wikipedia english | arxiv computer science | arxiv physics | github cpp | github python |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-1.7B-Base | 1.721 | 7.965 | 12.016 | 9.743 | 9.352 | 7.936 | 8.350 | 4.260 | 4.095 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b-20251015-ctx8192 | 1.527 | 7.969 | 10.972 | 9.250 | 8.843 | 8.110 | 8.537 | 5.041 | 5.027 |
| Qwen2.5-1.5B | 1.544 | 8.124 | 12.114 | 9.562 | 9.393 | 8.270 | 8.646 | 4.502 | 4.384 |
| RWKV-x070-World-1.5B-v3-20250127-ctx4096 | 1.527 | 8.231 | 11.273 | 9.320 | 8.965 | 8.431 | 8.758 | 5.385 | 5.483 |
| SmolLM2-1.7B | 1.711 | 8.298 | 11.536 | 9.373 | 9.351 | 8.547 | 9.047 | 5.080 | 5.152 |
| Llama-3.2-1B | 1.236 | 8.306 | 12.036 | 9.331 | 9.097 | 8.556 | 8.755 | 5.267 | 5.101 |
| Index-1.9B | 2.173 | 8.340 | 11.831 | 9.493 | 9.069 | 8.497 | 8.561 | 5.380 | 5.547 |
| stablelm-2-1_6b | 1.645 | 8.396 | 11.761 | 9.237 | 8.943 | 8.762 | 9.088 | 5.558 | 5.425 |
| Falcon-H1-1.5B-Deep-Base | 1.555 | 8.505 | 12.144 | 9.666 | 9.482 | 8.407 | 8.968 | 5.497 | 5.368 |
| RWKV-x060-World-1B6-v2.1-20240328-ctx4096 | 1.600 | 8.564 | 11.434 | 9.555 | 9.276 | 8.822 | 8.990 | 5.906 | 5.968 |
| Falcon-H1-1.5B-Base | 1.555 | 8.639 | 12.287 | 9.796 | 9.645 | 8.507 | 9.089 | 5.635 | 5.514 |
| mamba2-1.3b | 1.344 | 8.699 | 11.944 | 9.710 | 9.463 | 8.925 | 8.714 | 5.851 | 6.286 |
| RWKV-5-World-1B5-v2-20231025-ctx4096 | 1.578 | 8.715 | 11.595 | 9.731 | 9.451 | 8.977 | 9.103 | 6.039 | 6.110 |
| mamba-1.4b-hf | 1.372 | 8.806 | 12.026 | 9.783 | 9.552 | 9.081 | 8.836 | 5.958 | 6.408 |
MMLU Test
::: tip MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) is a widely recognized benchmark of general knowledge attained by AI models. It covers a broad range of topics from 57 different categories, covering elementary-level knowledge up to advanced professional subjects like law, physics, history, and computer science. :::
| Model | MMLU | MMLU COT |
|---|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 0.765 | 0.827 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b | 0.651 | 0.723 |
| RWKV7-g1a4-2.9b | 0.613 | 0.675 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b | 0.505 | 0.542 |
MMLU Pro Test
::: tip MMLU-Pro dataset is a more robust and challenging massive multi-task understanding dataset tailored to more rigorously benchmark large language models' capabilities. This dataset contains 12K complex questions across various disciplines. :::
| Model | MMLU-PRO | MMLU-PRO COT |
|---|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 0.502 | 0.612 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b | 0.359 | 0.521 |
| RWKV7-g1a4-2.9b | 0.324 | 0.43 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b | 0.222 | 0.292 |
GSM8K Test
::: tip GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) is a dataset of 8.5K high quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems. The dataset was created to support the task of question answering on basic mathematical problems that require multi-step reasoning. :::
| Model | GSM8K |
|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 0.923 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b | 0.839 |
| RWKV7-g1a4-2.9b | 0.773 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b | 0.585 |
MATH500 Test
::: tip MATH-500 is an authoritative benchmark for measuring the mathematical reasoning capabilities of AI models. It contains 500 challenging mathematical problems covering algebra, geometry, calculus, probability, statistics, and other fields. :::
| Model | MATH500 |
|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 0.768 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b | 0.678 |
| RWKV7-g1a4-2.9b | 0.482 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b | 0.298 |
IFEval
::: tip IFEval (Instruction-Following Evaluation) is a straightforward and easy-to-reproduce evaluation benchmark. It focuses on a set of "verifiable instructions" such as "write in more than 400 words" and "mention the keyword of AI at least 3 times". :::
| Model | IFEval (strict prompt-level) |
|---|---|
| RWKV7-g0b-13.3b | 0.689 |
| RWKV7-g0a3-7.2b | 0.58 |
| RWKV7-g1a3-2.9b | 0.51 |
| RWKV7-g1b-1.5b | 0.421 |
RULER Test
::: tip RULER is a new LLM testing method that optimizes and extends the NIAH (Needle In A Haystack) test. It includes four types of tasks: Enhanced Retrieval (Extended NIAH), Multi-hop Tracing, Information Aggregation (CWE, FWE), and QA with interference. :::
Enhanced Needle In A Haystack (NIAH)
RULER includes the Enhanced Needle In A Haystack (NIAH) test, divided into four sub-tasks to evaluate the model's retrieval capabilities:
| Sub-task | Brief Description |
|---|---|
| Single NIAH (S-NIAH) | Tests the model's ability to handle a single input and a single target output. |
| Multi-keys NIAH (MK-NIAH) | Tests the model's ability to handle multiple key-value pairs, where each key is associated with a single output. |
| Multi-values NIAH (MV-NIAH) | Tests the model's ability to handle multiple key-value pairs, where each key is associated with multiple values or outputs. |
| Multi-queries NIAH (MQ-NIAH) | Tests the model's ability to synthesize and generate corresponding results under multiple query conditions. |
Single NIAH test results are as follows:
| Model | NIAH_single_1 | NIAH_single_2 | NIAH_single_3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 100 | 98.67 | 95 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 97.6 | 100 | 96.8 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 100 | 19 | 1 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 94 | 21 | 5 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 100 | 88 | 79 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 98 | 53 | 55 |
NIAH-Multi-keys test results are as follows:
| Model | NIAH_multikey_1 | NIAH_multikey_2 | NIAH_multikey_3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 48.33 | 7.67 | 1.33 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 100 | 84.4 | 60 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 36 | 1 | 0 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 25 | 1 | 0 |
Multi-values and Multi-queries NIAH test results are as follows:
| Model | NIAH_multivalue | NIAH_multiquery |
|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 80.42 | 83.67 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 94 | 96.7 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 5.25 | 4.75 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 38.5 | 40.75 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 25 | 20.75 |
Variable Tracking (VT)
::: tip Multi-hop Tracing - Variable Tracking: This task mainly checks whether the model can successfully identify and track entities (variables) and reference relationships with multi-hop connections within a long context. For example, given the assignment $X_1 = V$, then $X_2 = X_1$, $X_3 = X_2$ ... finally returning all variable names pointing to the value $V$. :::
| Model | Multi-hop Tracing |
|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 7.53 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 63.12 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 45 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 23.4 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 11.8 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 1.4 |
Information Aggregation (CWE, FWE)
::: tip Information Aggregation (CWE, FWE): This task involves Common Words Extraction (CWE) and Frequent Words Extraction (FWE), used to test the model's ability to aggregate common information across long contexts. :::
| Model | Common Words Extraction (CWE) | Frequent Words Extraction (FWE) |
|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 38.6 | 78.33 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 73.04 | 78.8 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 2 | 53 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 15.5 | 57.33 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 30.3 | 62.67 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 11 | 46.33 |
Question Answering (QA)
::: tip Question Answering (QA): This task adds distracting information to the input of existing short-context QA datasets to evaluate QA capabilities under various context sizes. :::
| Model | qa_1 | qa_2 |
|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-7B-v2.1-4k | 45 | 37 |
| Llama2-7B-4k | 59.2 | 42 |
| Mamba-2.8B-4k | 23 | 18 |
| Mamba-1.4B-4k | 24 | 23 |
| RWKV-6-3B-v2.1-4k | 35 | 25 |
| RWKV-6-1.6B-v2.1-4k | 35 | 28 |
Data Source
RULER Data Source: https://github.com/Ojiyumm/RULER_RWKV
LongBench Test
::: tip LongBench is a benchmark for evaluating the long-text understanding capabilities of large language models.
LongBench consists of six major categories and twenty-one different bilingual (Chinese-English) tasks, covering critical long-text application scenarios such as Single-Document QA, Multi-Document QA, Summarization, Few-shot Learning, Synthetic Tasks, and Code Completion. :::
Below is a comparison of LongBench scores for RWKV and other models, with data tables presented by the six categories:
Single-Document QA
Single-Document QA includes the following four test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| NarrativeQA | QA based on stories or scripts, including understanding of characters, plots, themes, etc. |
| Qasper | QA based on single papers; questions are asked by NLP readers and answered by NLP practitioners. |
| MultiFieldQA-en | Answering English questions based on a single document from relatively diverse fields. |
| MultiFieldQA-zh | Answering Chinese questions based on a single document from relatively diverse fields. |
Single-Document QA Test Results:
| Model | NarrativeQA | Qasper | MultiFieldQA-en | MultiFieldQA-zh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 23.6 | 43.3 | 52.3 | 61.2 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 18.7 | 19.2 | 36.8 | 11.9 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 16.9 | 27.7 | 41.4 | 29.1 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 18.0 | 18.1 | 37.7 | 14.8 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 12.1 | 16.7 | 23.4 | 33.6 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 21.1 | 31.5 | 46.2 | 51.6 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 19.4 | 26.1 | 38.5 | 43.0 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 26.0 | 43.3 | 51.7 | 62.3 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 2.23 | 4.44 | 11.33 | 13.03 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 2.32 | 4.89 | 8.15 | 6.83 |
| Llama2-7B | 18.7 | 19.2 | 11.90 | 36.8 |
| Mistral-7B | 12.79 | 8.9 | 30.55 | 17.91 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 4.53 | 19.79 | 22.99 | 18.57 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 2.87 | 14.2 | 18.78 | 21.49 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 20.75 | 40.2 | 36.01 | 50.19 |
Multi-Document QA
Multi-Document QA includes the following four test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| HotpotQA | Answering questions based on HotpotQA documents; involves many 2-hop questions written by native speakers based on two related paragraphs. |
| 2WikiMultihopQA | Answering questions based on 2WikiMultihopQA data; composed of up to 5-hop questions synthesized via manually designed templates. |
| MuSiQue | Answering questions based on MuSiQue data; composed of simple questions requiring up to 4-hop reasoning. |
| DuReader | Answering questions based on the Chinese DuReader dataset, containing 200k questions and 1M documents from Baidu Search and Baidu Zhidao. |
Multi-Document QA Test Results:
| Model | HotpotQA | 2WikiMQA | Musique | DuReader (zh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 51.6 | 37.7 | 26.9 | 28.7 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 25.4 | 32.8 | 9.4 | 5.2 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 31.5 | 20.6 | 9.7 | 19.5 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 29.7 | 21.1 | 10.3 | 11.0 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 28.7 | 22.8 | 9.0 | 11.1 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 45.1 | 34.0 | 21.9 | 37.6 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 25.3 | 20.8 | 9.8 | 19.3 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 54.4 | 44.9 | 40.4 | 44.78 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 5.73 | 8.77 | 3.3 | 11.95 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 5.49 | 8.45 | 3.45 | 13.96 |
| Llama2-7B | 25.4 | 32.8 | 9.4 | 5.2 |
| Mistral-7B | 9.39 | 11.17 | 4.58 | 11.68 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 8.72 | 11.86 | 3.96 | 11.40 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 6.79 | 9.64 | 4.13 | 17.41 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 22.74 | 16.3 | 10.49 | 28.01 |
Summarization
The Summarization category involves the following four test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| GovReport | Summarization task requiring summaries of government work reports. |
| QMSum | Summarization task requiring summaries of meeting minutes based on user queries. |
| MultiNews | Multi-document summarization task requiring summaries based on multiple news articles. |
| VCSUM | Summarization task requiring summaries of Chinese meeting minutes. |
Summarization Test Results:
| Model | GovReport | QMSum | MultiNews | VCSUM (zh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 29.5 | 23.4 | 26.7 | 16.0 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 27.3 | 20.8 | 25.8 | 0.2 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 30.8 | 22.7 | 26.4 | 9.9 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 27.3 | 20.5 | 26.2 | 2.2 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 9.7 | 15.9 | 22.8 | 12.4 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 32.4 | 24.0 | 26.5 | 16.2 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 27.9 | 22.8 | 27.2 | 15.1 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 36.8 | 23.9 | 27.9 | 17.8 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 9.34 | 10.85 | 15.86 | 6.33 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 10.41 | 11.42 | 18.94 | 6.1 |
| Llama2-7B | 27.3 | 20.8 | 25.8 | 0.2 |
| Mistral-7B | 28.84 | 20.32 | 22.79 | 4.1 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 17.51 | 20.36 | 21.52 | 10.71 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 19.21 | 21 | 21.76 | 10.18 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 31.64 | 21.31 | 26.06 | 15.19 |
Few-shot Learning
Few-shot Learning includes the following four test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| TREC | Classification task requiring question classification, containing 50 categories in total. |
| TriviaQA | Single-document QA task, providing several Few-shot examples. |
| SAMSum | Dialogue summarization task, providing several Few-shot examples. |
| LSHT | Chinese classification task requiring news classification, containing 24 categories in total. |
Few-shot Learning Test Results:
| Model | TREC | TriviaQA | SAMSum | LSHT (zh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 68.0 | 91.4 | 41.7 | 29.2 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 61.5 | 77.8 | 40.7 | 19.8 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 63.5 | 82.3 | 34.2 | 23.2 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 65.5 | 77.8 | 25.3 | 20.5 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 52.0 | 77.8 | 21.2 | 15.2 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 62.5 | 78.7 | 36.3 | 27.7 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 71.5 | 86.2 | 40.8 | 28.8 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 79.0 | 87.1 | 38.2 | 42.0 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 45.5 | 37.33 | 12.56 | 8.5 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 21.5 | 34.62 | 9.3 | 5 |
| Llama2-7B | 61.5 | 77.8 | 40.7 | 19.8 |
| Mistral-7B | 70.0 | 89.26 | 43.74 | 25.5 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 39.5 | 47.64 | 13.58 | 18.8 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 51.5 | 57.15 | 17.95 | 15.2 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 55.5 | 86.89 | 44.25 | 30.2 |
Synthetic Tasks
Synthetic Tasks include the following three test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| PassageCount | Determine the total number of unique paragraphs among the given paragraphs. |
| PassageRetrieval-en | Given 30 English Wikipedia paragraphs, determine which paragraph the given summary belongs to. |
| PassageRetrieval-zh | Given several Chinese paragraphs from the C4 dataset, determine which paragraph the given summary belongs to. |
Synthetic Tasks Test Results:
| Model | Passage Count | PassageRetrieval-en | PassageRetrieval-zh |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 4.5 | 71.0 | 77.5 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 2.1 | 9.8 | 0.5 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 1.0 | 30.5 | 7.6 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 2.1 | 8.5 | 3.5 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 3.0 | 6.0 | 0.9 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 1.5 | 77.0 | 64.5 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 6.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 2.0 | 99.0 | 94.0 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 0.45 | 3.32 | 3.81 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 0.74 | 1.83 | 3.37 |
| Llama2-7B | 2.1 | 9.8 | 0.5 |
| Mistral-7B | 1.05 | 12.5 | 16.75 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.16 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 0 | 3.83 | 4.12 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 5 | 34.5 | 54.22 |
Code Completion
Code Completion includes the following two test tasks:
| Task | Task Description |
|---|---|
| LCC | Given a long piece of code, predict the next line of code. |
| RepoBench-P | Given code from multiple files in a GitHub repository (including inter-file dependencies), predict the next line of code. |
Code Completion Test Results:
| Model | LCC | RepoBench-P |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k | 54.7 | 53.6 |
| Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 52.4 | 43.8 |
| LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 53.0 | 55.3 |
| XGen-7B-8k | 38.6 | 38.6 |
| InternLM-7B-8k | 44.1 | 28.8 |
| ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 55.6 | 49.9 |
| Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 51.0 | 43.5 |
| ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 57.66 | 54.76 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 44.33 | 41.86 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 39.53 | 24.38 |
| Llama2-7B | 52.4 | 43.8 |
| Mistral-7B | 70.64 | 59.7 |
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 39.5 | 40.44 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 40.01 | 41.35 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 73.84 | 54.1 |
Comprehensive Score Comparison of RWKV, Mamba, and Llama2
| Model | Single DocQ | Few-shc | Summarization | Multi Doc QA | Code Completion | Syntetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWKV-6-World-1B6-v2.1 | 16.470 | 29.868 | 17.525 | 8.985 | 39.970 | 2.803 |
| RWKV-6-World-3B-v2.1 | 14.335 | 35.443 | 18.038 | 9.493 | 40.680 | 2.650 |
| RWKV-6-World-7b-v2.1-4k | 36.788 | 54.203 | 23.550 | 19.385 | 63.970 | 31.240 |
| Mamba_1B4 | 7.758 | 25.973 | 10.595 | 7.438 | 43.095 | 2.527 |
| Mamba_2B8 | 5.548 | 17.605 | 11.718 | 7.838 | 31.955 | 1.980 |
| Llama2-7B | 21.650 | 49.950 | 18.525 | 18.200 | 48.100 | 4.133 |
| Mistral-7B | 17.538 | 52.833 | 19.013 | 9.205 | 65.17 | 10.100 |
Data Source
Evaluation Data Source: https://github.com/Ojiyumm/LongBench_RWKV
What's inside
8 benchmark sections, each with tip boxes and comparison tables; 4 parameter-size tables for Uncheatable Eval; 6 LongBench sub-category tables.
Change this for your project
- Replace model names like
RWKV7-g0b-13.3bwith your own model identifiers - Replace benchmark scores with your own evaluation results
- Replace data source URLs like
https://github.com/Ojiyumm/RULER_RWKVwith your own references
Where it goes
Keep alongside your test suite. Used to define and score model evaluations.
Worth borrowing
- Grouping models by parameter size (14B, 7B, 3B, 1.5B) for easy comparison
- Using tip boxes to explain each benchmark's methodology before showing results
- Including both raw scores and chain-of-thought (COT) variants for MMLU tests
Related Documents
IATA BCBP Standard Compliance
Documents which IATA BCBP fields and barcode formats a Swift library implements, including Version 8 gender code support.
Evaluating AI Agent Systems: Metrics, Benchmarks, and Quality Assurance (2024-2026)
Surveys 2024-2026 metrics, benchmarks, and monitoring tools for evaluating AI agent systems, with recommendations for a self-improving coding agent.
Voice AI Leaderboards, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Gaps (Jan 2025 -- Feb 2026)
Surveys 20+ voice AI benchmarks from Jan 2025, Feb 2026, identifies evaluation gaps, and provides leaderboard data for STT, TTS, and end-to-end voice agents.
LLM Evaluation — Deep Dive
Covers why LLM evaluation is hard, benchmark taxonomy, LLM-as-judge methodology, contamination, robustness, and designing an eval suite for a product.