Comprehensive evaluation of 15 AI coding agents (Cursor, Copilot, Claude, Replit, v0, Warp, etc.) with implementations, screenshots, and professional scoring. Published on Turing Post.

June 2025 Coding Agent Report

📄 Download the Full Report (PDF) - Complete 61-page evaluation with detailed analysis

Below is a summary of my discoveries, but if you want to dive into the full details you can also read it on Turing Post.

Overview

This repository contains the complete June 2025 coding agent evaluation, including the original report, source materials, and implementation examples from each tested agent.

Key Findings

Top Performers

• Overall Winner: Cursor + Warp (24 points each)
• Professional Development: Cursor Background Agent (24/24 - strongly recommend hire)
• Casual Users: Replit (easy setup, integrated hosting)
• Product Design: v0 (excellent UI iteration, NextJS/Vercel focused)
• Enterprise: Cursor Agent, Jules (GitHub integration, SDLC focused)
• Experts/Tinkerers: RooCode, Goose (BYOM, local model support)

Agent Categories Evaluated

IDE Agents

• Cursor - Traditional autocomplete, requires expertise
• Cursor - Professional favorite, great developer experience
• RooCode - Expert-level, excellent BYOM support
• Windsurf - Basic functionality, needs improvement

CLI Agents

• aider - First OSS agent, git-heavy workflow
• Claude Code - Solid output, blinking lights UI
• Codex CLI - Functional but unremarkable
• Goose - Configuration-heavy, expert-focused

Full-Stack Agents

• Codex Agent - GitHub integration, PM-friendly
• Cursor Agent - Game-changing potential if it works
• Cursor Agent - Surprising background capabilities
• Jules -