"Vibe" coding is a trap in the long run — Cursor Community | Neura Market
    Neura MarketNeura Market/Cursor
    ChatGPTChatGPTClaudeClaudeGeminiGeminiCursorCursorGrokGrokPerplexityPerplexityDeepSeekDeepSeek
    CoPilotCoPilotStable DiffusionStable DiffusionMidjourneyMidjourney
    View All Directories
    OverviewRulesPromptsMCPsAgentsBlogVideosGuidesCoursesCommunityExtensionsTrendingGenerate
    CursorCommunity"Vibe" coding is a trap in the long run
    Back to Community

    "Vibe" coding is a trap in the long run

    Significant-Tip-8441 March 8, 2025
    467 likes
    If you're using cursor, or any other AI-assisted IDE for 'vibe coding' (just feeding it with better or worse prompts, rules, getting angry at it, emoticons etc.) and have zero knowledge about how the tech stack you use is working - you are asking yourself for trouble. Sure, LLM's are getting better in understanding, solving problems and general thinking. Sometimes when you write beautifully crafted prompt, along with your great cursor rules you've found online, you'll get great results - feature you've wanted works, bug is fixed etc. Hell, sometimes you can even prompt your way to an app with full functionality that you've imagined - without single line of code written by yourself! Yay! But without knowing anything about what is the logic behind this, how things work, what the code does, how it is structured among files/classes/functions, what is going on with app lifecycle, how data is stored in db/files/sessions/cache, what libraries/frameworks are used, what security/throttle measures are used (and IF they are even used) when using backend/apis etc. you're really asking yourself for trouble. I'm a software developer since around 2012. I've created dozens of various sized projects on different stacks (js/sql/nosql/php/python/mobile/vr + all the modern frameworks) by pure hand coding - and I've been watching the whole AI boom since its beginning. Nowadays I've grown to use and even like Cursor and all the assist LLMs can give. It's now part of my workflow - and it's really making me more productive by letting AI do some tedious work under supervision. BUT - if you don't know shit about what's going on and just rely on AI to do great product for you by talking and instructing... you will probably fail at some point. The bigger the project is, the more it grows - the more knowledge it requires. Context window is really really low when it comes to projects with 1000s or more lines of code - and while tech people can understand how it works and where to look for something - AI is FAR FROM THAT - it doesn't really use reason, logic, it just looks for patterns it was trained with. We are far from giving whole big code repo to AI and making it understand the project like a dev who looked at the same code for a week, or even a day. Sure, there are rules, MCP, MD files - but no LLM will handle full codebase at once - and it will forget the rules and md files after some time and just create some shitty or redundant code. And you won't see it without knowledge. Also, if you're testing everything by yourself locally, or even with your family/friends, without proper stress/security/functional tests - many things can work really different on production when even 20 people at once will do sonething with the app, let alone tens of thousands. I know that many vibe coders, vibe startup CEOs and vibe enterpreneurs making new apps every few days here will say that It's BS, but really - you don't want to be in the situation where your app stops working, you don't know why, cursor/AI cannot fix it even if you yell at it or pretty please it (😆) and your paying customers are getting angry... I've been there and it's not nice - sometimes even having 3 or 4 dev team members looking up the bug with you costs significant amount of time and nerves... And money What will happen when vibe-coded apps explode, and you dont have a clue about what happened + cannot even tell some real dev how it works? And if you think that eventually you will get a dev and he will magically fix everything about your app within hours - he might - in 5 hours, or in 300 hours, when the app is so badly written that 90% needs refactor. Charging you lots of money for it Don't just vibe-code, tell agent to fix the error or gett angry at it - try to learn what happens in each section of your app and how it works Try to find not needed or redundant code early and keep the codebase clean and structured logically. Think about efficient storing/getting data, think about security, think about how users can try to abuse your app. And if you don't know how - do research and learn, or ask someone who does know to teach you, or you will regret it at some point
    Visit

    Comments

    More Community

    View all

    Someone did a deep dive into Cursor Agent and discovered that it was literally just Claude Code with a process that does search and replace to brand it as Cursor Agent

    [https://gist.github.com/jasonkneen/4c065df2d7a95610e4fd30c3e3398b17](https://gist.github.com/jasonkneen/4c065df2d7a95610e4fd30c3e3398b17)

    D
    DrySalamander9728
    178

    How I use Cursor 10+ hours a day without torching my Claude Opus 4.6 limits

    Anyone else here doing full-stack Next.js in Cursor and watching the Claude quota evaporate before lunch? I used to be in the same boat — massive context windows from all the components, pages, and DB logic would smoke the default limits fast. Not anymore. I’ve been on this setup for weeks and basically never hit a wall while still getting top-tier answers. Here’s exactly what I do: **1. .cursorrules is non-negotiable** I keep one in the root of every project. The key line I added: “Never explain the code to me. Just output the code blocks.” That single rule saves me thousands of output tokens a day. No more walls of “here’s what I changed and why” — just the goods. **2. Stopped using Cursor’s built-in Claude quota** I killed the default Cursor Pro subscription for the heavy stuff. Instead I use my own API keys and point Cursor’s “OpenAI Compatible” base URL at LLM Router Gateway. Inside [llmrouter](https://llmrouter.app/) routing settings I set up simple tags routing like this: * **UI & CSS tweaks**: gemini-3.1-flash → gpt-5.4-mini * **Deep backend / complex logic**: claude-opus-4.6 → deepseek-v3.2 * **General / quick questions**: llama-4-scout I sorted the fallback chains by speed vs intelligence. The router auto-detects the query type, so 90% of my UI polish and small fixes go to Gemini (basically free + huge context). I only actually hit Claude Opus 4.6 when I’m doing nasty database refactors or tricky architecture stuff. My Anthropic bill dropped \~70% overnight. **3. Cmd+K for everything small** Don’t open the full chat sidebar just to rename a variable or extract a component. Highlight the code, hit Cmd+K, let a fast model handle the inline edit. Saves a ton of tokens and feels way snappier. That’s it. Super simple but it completely changed how much I can actually use Cursor in a day. How are you all managing the limits? Using a Cursor Team? Or did you build your own router hacks too? Drop your setups — always looking to steal better ideas.

    Y
    Youssef_Wardi
    310

    Cursor V3 is a significant regression

    So I used to be a big cursor fan - striked the right balance between trusting the AI and being able to check the work. The new version however, sucks. Worktrees are now essentially AI initiated magic git commands that require manual approval, which is slow and annoying, and means I have to read through a bunch of git guff, and I have to wait like a minute before it does any real work for it to essentially do something that can be duplicated with a script, and it doesn't work well half the time - it had to retry twice to apply worktree changes! The new agent screen is pretty useless, because now you need to go and select a bunch of information that previously would be entirely obvious from context i.e. alt-tabbing into a specific repo's IDE. I don't like this direction and if they continue, I might start looking at competitors. Cursor is clearly aimed at and used by developers who can read code and want to read the code produced by AI. I use Claude Code if I want to just trust the AI.

    E
    ExaminationNo8522
    212

    Introducing Cursor 3

    We’re introducing Cursor 3. It is simpler, more powerful, and built for a world where all code is written by agents, while keeping the depth of a development environment. With the new Cursor, you can run as many agents as you want, everywhere you want: locally, in a worktree, on remote ssh, and in the cloud. And it has the best parts of the editor available when you need them. The new interface is available as a separate window that complements the IDE. Update Cursor to try it. We recently launched Composer 2, a frontier model with high limits. Then, with cloud, we gave agents their own computers so they can work truly autonomously. And now with Cursor 3, we’re releasing a new interface to collaborate with agents on software.

    L
    lrobinson2011
    184

    Cursor 3 out now

    Cursor 3 out now

    G
    Graniteman
    125

    They kinda cute

    They kinda cute

    S
    sugandalai
    828

    Stay up to date

    Get the latest Cursor prompts, rules, and resources delivered to your inbox weekly.

    Neura Market LogoNeura Market

    Discover the best AI prompts, plugins, and resources for Cursor and more.

    Content Types

    • Rules
    • Prompts
    • MCPs
    • Agents
    • Guides

    Platforms

    • ChatGPT Directory
    • Claude Directory
    • Gemini Directory
    • Cursor Directory
    • Grok Directory
    • Perplexity Directory
    • DeepSeek Directory
    • CoPilot Directory
    • Stable Diffusion Directory
    • Midjourney Directory
    • All Directories

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Documentation
    • Help Center
    • Marketplace

    Legal

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service

    © 2026 Neura Market. All rights reserved.

    |

    Not affiliated with any AI platform vendors.