I'm convinced context windows are a marketing lie. Spent 3 hours begging Cursor to follow ONE simple instruction. Had to ask it 5 times and see how it says 'I understand' and makes EXACTLY WHAT I ASKED NOT TO DO.
I was working on a .NET task (relying on the agent heavily). I gave Cursor a dead-simple negative constraint in the **same prompt: "**Use ONLY git commit -m 'message'. DO NOT add trailers, Co-authored-by, or metadata." All I wanted was one thing: **Clean git commits.** I had to repeat myself 5 times. It wasn't even about the model "forgetting" over time actually—agent just straight up ignored the rule **IN THE VERY TURN** it was executing. It literally looked at my command, said "I understand," and then proceeded to ship a commit message with 5 lines of trailers I asked not to add. Why is this happening? It feels like the more instructions you give (I had about 30 lines of project logic), the more the model's attention drifts toward its training data. It defaults to "standard" GitHub patterns because it’s more "comfortable" for the weights of the model than actually listening to the user. I had to manually fix the commits. Bruh.
Generate optimized .cursorrules files tailored to your project's tech stack, conventions, and team preferences. Covers TypeScript, Python, Rust, Go, and more.
Leverage Cursor's Agent mode to build complete features end-to-end. Handles file creation, terminal commands, dependency installation, and multi-file edits in one flow.
Generate complete React components with TypeScript types, props interface, stories, and unit tests in one prompt.
Generate robust Next.js API routes with Zod validation, error handling, rate limiting, and TypeScript types.
Design database tables with proper types, constraints, indexes, and migration files for PostgreSQL/Supabase.
Generate FastAPI endpoints with Pydantic request/response models, dependency injection, and async database operations.