“Porn Grok” is dead, stop moderation complaining. Let's rather mobilize for a separate “NSFW Grok”. Grok is used for other things too, and that makes things complicated when it comes to moderation and features disabled and enabled.
There is almost going sport or a complain trend about how much Grok is moderating content these days, and it looks like many people don`t really want to accept the fact that The Grok in 2025 is never to be seen again. “Porn Grok” is dead. Those who chose to create and share content that never should have been shared killed it - creating the content was really not the main problem - its ai! But sharing it was the main problem here. And now we are left with an over moderating system, scared of letting almost anything that could be of direct sexual intent true the filter. Let`s stop being in denial about that, but we all understand the frustration. When a dream and wish for years to create sexualized content from our own imagination finally became a reality, it was almost “traumatizing” to have it taken away from us. =D. We are all frustrated, but blame the ones who made Grok to what it is today. Some of us just wanted to create content for our own enjoyment or share how to create content, but never share the actual content. ;o)
Lets rather mobilize for the creation of an individual NSFW Grok platform, with forbidden direct share and deepfake use. Strict filter and fast ban for child content creation, etc and same signup verification system like the one Onlyfans and those have to become a creator on their platforms - to make sure the creator of grok content is a person and legal for creating content - today's verification is a joke, no wonder the demanded restrictions too. :o)
Grok is a great model for creating NSFW content, but with the strict moderation it is useless if your intention is to create mainstream sexualized intended content.
Create a SEPARATE NSFW Grok platform!!
If you are so lucky to be one of those people to have more than just mainstream sexual preferences, but innocent preferences related to a fetish or two, Grok can be an amazing tool to create content with. It understands fetish related content well, if the prompt structure and wording is good - yes, you will meet moderation on the most innocent of content here too, but then it has more to do with wording needing adjustment.
Aurora just got a major update and the results are noticeably better. Photorealism is approaching Midjourney v6 quality, and it handles text in images better than DALL-E 3. The best part: it's included in your X Premium+ subscription with no per-image cost. Generated a full set of marketing assets for a client project — 30+ images — for $0 additional cost. The main limitation is still the lack of fine-grained control compared to Midjourney.
Tested Grok's DeepSearch on 20 recent news topics and compared against Perplexity Pro. Grok was faster to surface breaking developments (thanks to X data access) and better at synthesizing multiple perspectives on controversial topics. Perplexity was better at academic/scientific queries and provided cleaner citations. For news analysis and social sentiment tracking, Grok DeepSearch is genuinely the best tool available right now.
If you're building anything that needs real-time social analysis, the Grok + X API combination is unbeatable. We built a brand monitoring dashboard that pulls X posts, feeds them to Grok for sentiment analysis and trend detection, and generates daily briefs. The model understands internet culture and slang better than any competitor. Processing 50k posts/day and our total API bill is under $200/month.
Ran a structured evaluation of Grok vs ChatGPT vs Claude on 50 politically sensitive prompts. Grok is noticeably less likely to refuse or hedge on controversial questions — it will give you a direct answer with caveats rather than declining to engage. Whether this is good or bad depends on your use case. For research and journalism, the reduced friction is valuable. For customer-facing products, the lack of guardrails could be a liability.
Grok 3 hit #2 on the LMSys Arena leaderboard and I've been putting it through its paces. It's genuinely strong at creative tasks and has a unique voice that's less corporate than ChatGPT. The "fun mode" can be hit or miss but "accurate mode" is surprisingly reliable for research. Biggest weakness: it hallucinates citations more than Claude or GPT. Biggest strength: it processes X/Twitter data in real-time, which is genuinely unique for breaking news analysis.
Grok shud learn from Kling 😀
Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Grok resource