Img Q: A very close, detailed portrait of a beautiful 30-year-old Korean woman with fair, smooth skin, straight, slightly messy, semi-long black hair with brown highlights, just waking up. She has a slender, toned body, very large, firm, and voluminous breasts (at least a D cup), and wears a very sensual black lace bra. She is raising one arm behind her head in a seductive pose, revealing perfectly smooth, light underarms. She wears some flirty but natural makeup. The room is minimalist, with melon-colored walls and a comfortable bed. The dim lighting is provided by a window that partially illuminates the room, creating a beautiful contrast. The scene is early morning, with sunlight streaming through the window, which has some natural grime. The image simulates a realistic photograph taken with a mid-range cell phone camera.
Aurora just got a major update and the results are noticeably better. Photorealism is approaching Midjourney v6 quality, and it handles text in images better than DALL-E 3. The best part: it's included in your X Premium+ subscription with no per-image cost. Generated a full set of marketing assets for a client project — 30+ images — for $0 additional cost. The main limitation is still the lack of fine-grained control compared to Midjourney.
Tested Grok's DeepSearch on 20 recent news topics and compared against Perplexity Pro. Grok was faster to surface breaking developments (thanks to X data access) and better at synthesizing multiple perspectives on controversial topics. Perplexity was better at academic/scientific queries and provided cleaner citations. For news analysis and social sentiment tracking, Grok DeepSearch is genuinely the best tool available right now.
If you're building anything that needs real-time social analysis, the Grok + X API combination is unbeatable. We built a brand monitoring dashboard that pulls X posts, feeds them to Grok for sentiment analysis and trend detection, and generates daily briefs. The model understands internet culture and slang better than any competitor. Processing 50k posts/day and our total API bill is under $200/month.
Ran a structured evaluation of Grok vs ChatGPT vs Claude on 50 politically sensitive prompts. Grok is noticeably less likely to refuse or hedge on controversial questions — it will give you a direct answer with caveats rather than declining to engage. Whether this is good or bad depends on your use case. For research and journalism, the reduced friction is valuable. For customer-facing products, the lack of guardrails could be a liability.
Grok 3 hit #2 on the LMSys Arena leaderboard and I've been putting it through its paces. It's genuinely strong at creative tasks and has a unique voice that's less corporate than ChatGPT. The "fun mode" can be hit or miss but "accurate mode" is surprisingly reliable for research. Biggest weakness: it hallucinates citations more than Claude or GPT. Biggest strength: it processes X/Twitter data in real-time, which is genuinely unique for breaking news analysis.
Grok shud learn from Kling 😀
Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Grok resource