ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
2.3k
Citations
148
Influential Citations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Venue
2008
Year
<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> Multiagent systems are rapidly finding applications in a variety of domains, including robotics, distributed control, telecommunications, and economics. The complexity of many tasks arising in these domains makes them difficult to solve with preprogrammed agent behaviors. The agents must, instead, discover a solution on their own, using learning. A significant part of the research on multiagent learning concerns reinforcement learning techniques. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL). A central issue in the field is the formal statement of the multiagent learning goal. Different viewpoints on this issue have led to the proposal of many different goals, among which two focal points can be distinguished: stability of the agents' learning dynamics, and adaptation to the changing behavior of the other agents. The MARL algorithms described in the literature aim---either explicitly or implicitly---at one of these two goals or at a combination of both, in a fully cooperative, fully competitive, or more general setting. A representative selection of these algorithms is discussed in detail in this paper, together with the specific issues that arise in each category. Additionally, the benefits and challenges of MARL are described along with some of the problem domains where the MARL techniques have been applied. Finally, an outlook for the field is provided. </para>
This survey, published in 2008, is one of the most cited papers in multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL). It provides a structured overview of the field at a time when MARL was rapidly expanding into diverse domains such as robotics, distributed control, telecommunications, and economics. The paper's main contribution is its clear framing of the central issue in MARL: the formal statement of the multiagent learning goal. By distinguishing between stability of the agents' learning dynamics and adaptation to the changing behavior of other agents, the authors offer a lens through which to understand and compare the many algorithms that had been proposed.
The paper is significant because it organizes a fragmented literature into a coherent taxonomy. It covers fully cooperative, fully competitive, and general-sum settings, each with its own challenges and representative algorithms. This categorization helps researchers and practitioners identify which methods are suitable for their specific problem domain. The survey also discusses the benefits and challenges of MARL, such as the curse of dimensionality and the non-stationarity of the environment, which remain relevant today.
As a survey, the paper does not present new experimental results. Its main output is a comprehensive mapping of the MARL landscape. The paper has accumulated over 2,200 citations, indicating its high impact and widespread use as a reference. The taxonomy and framing introduced in this survey have been adopted by many subsequent works.
This survey has had a lasting impact on the field of multiagent reinforcement learning. It provided a common vocabulary and conceptual framework that enabled researchers to better communicate and compare their work. The distinction between stability and adaptation remains a central theme in MARL research. The paper also highlighted open challenges, such as handling large state-action spaces and non-stationary environments, which continue to drive research today. For AI practitioners, this survey is an essential starting point for understanding the foundations of MARL and selecting appropriate algorithms for multiagent problems.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba