ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
877
Citations
27
Influential Citations
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Venue
2025
Year
Large language model (LLM)-based agents have recently attracted much attention from the research and industry communities. Compared with original LLMs, LLM-based agents are featured in their self-evolving capability, which is the basis for solving real-world problems that need long-term and complex agent-environment interactions. The key component to support agent-environment interactions is the memory of the agents. While previous studies have proposed many promising memory mechanisms, they are scattered in different papers, and there lacks a systematical review to summarize and compare these works from a holistic perspective, failing to abstract common and effective designing patterns for inspiring future studies. To bridge this gap, in this article, we propose a comprehensive survey on the memory mechanism of LLM-based agents. In specific, we first discuss “what is” and “why do we need” the memory in LLM-based agents. Then, we systematically review previous studies on how to design and evaluate the memory module. In addition, we also present many agent applications, where the memory module plays an important role. At last, we analyze the limitations of existing work and show important future directions. To keep up with the latest advances in this field, we create a repository at https://github.com/nuster1128/LLM_Agent_Memory_Survey .
Large language model (LLM)-based agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for solving complex, real-world problems that require long-term interactions with dynamic environments. Unlike standalone LLMs, agents possess a self-evolving capability that hinges on their ability to remember past experiences and use that information to adapt. However, research on memory mechanisms for LLM-based agents has been fragmented across numerous papers, with no systematic review to distill common design patterns or evaluate trade-offs. This survey fills that critical gap by providing the first comprehensive overview of memory in LLM-based agents, offering a holistic perspective that is essential for both newcomers and seasoned researchers.
The paper's significance is further amplified by the rapid growth of the field. With hundreds of citations already, it is clear that the community has been awaiting such a synthesis. By organizing existing knowledge, the survey enables researchers to build upon a shared understanding rather than reinventing solutions. Moreover, it highlights the importance of memory as a cornerstone for agent-environment interactions, paving the way for more sophisticated and autonomous agents.
As a survey paper, it does not present new experimental results but instead synthesizes findings from a large body of literature. It identifies that memory mechanisms can be broadly categorized into short-term and long-term memory, with various implementations such as vector databases, knowledge graphs, and recurrent architectures. The survey notes that while many promising approaches exist, there is a lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks and metrics, making it difficult to compare different memory designs directly. It also highlights that most existing work focuses on specific application domains, such as dialogue systems or task-oriented agents, and that general-purpose memory mechanisms remain an open challenge.
This survey is poised to become a foundational reference for the growing community of researchers and practitioners working on LLM-based agents. By providing a clear taxonomy and identifying open problems, it accelerates progress toward more capable, self-evolving agents that can operate effectively in complex, real-world environments. The maintained repository ensures that the survey remains current, fostering ongoing collaboration and innovation. Ultimately, this work contributes to the broader goal of building AI systems that can learn and adapt over time, bringing us closer to truly autonomous agents.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba