ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
7
Citations
0
Influential Citations
Diagnostics
Venue
2025
Year
Background: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide. Accurate early detection of lymphocytes and molecular biomarkers is essential for improving diagnostic precision and patient prognosis. Whole slide images (WSIs) are central to digital pathology workflows in breast cancer assessment. However, applying deep learning techniques to WSIs presents persistent challenges, including variability in image quality, limited availability of high-quality annotations, poor model interpretability, high computational demands, and suboptimal processing efficiency. Methods: This systematic review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), examines deep learning-based detection methods for breast cancer published between 2020 and 2024. The analysis includes 39 peer-reviewed studies and 20 widely used WSI datasets. Results: To enhance clinical relevance and guide model development, this study introduces a five-dimensional evaluation framework covering accuracy and performance, robustness and generalization, interpretability, computational efficiency, and annotation quality. The framework facilitates a balanced and clinically aligned assessment of both established methods and recent innovations. Conclusions: This review offers a comprehensive analysis and proposes a practical roadmap for addressing core challenges in WSI-based breast cancer detection. It fills a critical gap in the literature and provides actionable guidance for researchers, clinicians, and developers seeking to optimize and translate WSI-based technologies into clinical workflows for comprehensive breast cancer assessment.
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among women, and accurate early detection is critical. Whole slide images (WSIs) are central to digital pathology, but applying deep learning to them is fraught with challenges: image quality variability, scarce high-quality annotations, poor interpretability, high computational costs, and suboptimal processing efficiency. This systematic review directly addresses these issues by synthesizing the state of the art from 2020 to 2024 and proposing a structured evaluation framework.
The paper's significance lies in its comprehensive, PRISMA-guided approach. By analyzing 39 peer-reviewed studies and 20 WSI datasets, it offers a broad yet detailed landscape of current deep learning detection technologies. More importantly, it introduces a five-dimensional evaluation framework that goes beyond mere accuracy, encompassing robustness, interpretability, computational efficiency, and annotation quality. This holistic perspective is crucial for translating research into clinical practice, where these factors are often as important as raw performance.
The paper does not report quantitative performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, AUC) from individual studies, as it is a systematic review. Instead, its main result is the development and application of the five-dimensional framework. The framework reveals that no single method excels across all dimensions; for instance, high-accuracy models often suffer from poor interpretability or high computational demands. The review also identifies common limitations in existing studies, such as reliance on single datasets and lack of external validation, which the framework helps to highlight. The practical roadmap synthesizes these findings into a step-by-step guide for developing clinically viable WSI-based detection systems.
This review fills a critical gap in the literature by providing a structured, clinically aligned evaluation methodology for WSI-based breast cancer detection. For AI practitioners, the five-dimensional framework offers a template for evaluating and comparing deep learning models in medical imaging, encouraging a shift from purely accuracy-driven development to a more holistic consideration of real-world constraints. The roadmap can accelerate the translation of research into clinical workflows, potentially improving diagnostic precision and patient prognosis. Moreover, the systematic compilation of datasets and challenges serves as a foundation for future research, fostering reproducibility and collaboration in the field.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba