Preprint
Reinforcement Learning

Control Under Compression: Reliability Frontiers for Tool-Using Agents

August 1, 2026

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

… c) Tool-using agents.: ReAct interleaves reasoning with environment actions [8]; Toolformer learns when and how to invoke tools [9]; and ToolLLM and Gorilla study large API collections …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

As AI agents increasingly rely on external tools (APIs, databases, etc.), the communication between the agent and the tool becomes a bottleneck. In many real-world scenarios, bandwidth is limited, or latency is critical, so compressing control signals is essential. However, aggressive compression can degrade reliability. This paper addresses this trade-off head-on, introducing the concept of 'reliability frontiers' to characterize the optimal balance between control complexity and task success.

The paper is significant because it moves beyond the typical focus on accuracy alone, considering the cost of control. This is particularly relevant for edge AI, mobile agents, and multi-agent systems where communication is expensive. By formalizing the problem, the authors provide a foundation for future research on communication-efficient agent design.

Technical Contributions

  • Formalization of control compression: The paper defines control compression as the process of reducing the information content of an agent's actions while preserving task success. This is framed as a constrained optimization problem.
  • Reliability frontiers: A new evaluation metric that plots task success rate against control information (e.g., number of tokens or bits). This provides a comprehensive view of an agent's efficiency-reliability trade-off.
  • Compression-aware training: A training method that incorporates a compression penalty into the reinforcement learning objective, encouraging the agent to produce concise yet effective control signals.
  • Benchmark suite: A set of tool-use tasks with varying complexity and compression requirements, enabling standardized evaluation.

Results

The proposed method achieves up to 20% higher success rate than ReAct, Toolformer, and ToolLLM under high compression (e.g., 50% token reduction). It also uses 30% fewer control tokens on average, indicating better efficiency. The reliability frontier analysis shows that the proposed method dominates baselines across all compression levels, meaning it achieves higher success for the same control budget.

Significance

This work has broad implications for the deployment of AI agents in resource-constrained environments. By providing a principled way to measure and optimize the reliability-compression trade-off, it enables the design of agents that are both effective and efficient. The concept of reliability frontiers could become a standard evaluation tool for agentic systems, similar to ROC curves in classification. Future work may extend this to multi-agent communication and dynamic compression adaptation.