Preprint
Large Language Models

Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning

David Baidoo-Anu(Queen's University), Leticia Owusu Ansah(University of Cape Coast)
December 7, 2023Journal of AI2,991 citations

3.0k

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Journal of AI

Venue

2023

Year

Abstract

Since its maiden release into the public domain on November 30, 2022, ChatGPT garnered more than one million subscribers within a week. The generative AI tool ⎼ChatGPT took the world by surprise with it sophisticated capacity to carry out remarkably complex tasks. The extraordinary abilities of ChatGPT to perform complex tasks within the field of education has caused mixed feelings among educators as this advancement in AI seems to revolutionize existing educational praxis. This review article synthesizes recent extant literature to offer some potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Benefits of ChatGPT include but are not limited to promotion of personalized and interactive learning, generating prompts for formative assessment activities that provide ongoing feedback to inform teaching and learning etc. The paper also highlights some inherent limitations in the ChatGPT such as generating wrong information, biases in data training which may augment existing biases, privacy issues etc. The study offers recommendations on how ChatGPT could be leveraged to maximize teaching and learning. Policy makers, researchers, educators and technology experts could work together and start conversations on how these evolving generative AI tools could be used safely and constructively to improve education and support students’ learning.

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Since ChatGPT's public release in November 2022, it has rapidly become a focal point in discussions about the future of education. This paper by Baidoo-Anu and Ansah addresses the urgent need to understand how generative AI can be leveraged to enhance teaching and learning, while also acknowledging the concerns it raises among educators. By synthesizing recent literature, the authors provide a balanced overview of the potential benefits and limitations of ChatGPT in educational contexts, making it a valuable resource for educators, policymakers, and researchers navigating this emerging landscape.

The paper's significance is underscored by the explosive growth of ChatGPT, which garnered over one million subscribers within a week. Its sophisticated capacity to perform complex tasks has the potential to revolutionize educational praxis, but it also causes mixed feelings due to risks such as misinformation and bias. This review serves as an early attempt to map the terrain, offering recommendations for safe and constructive use. Given the paper's high citation count (2991), it has clearly struck a chord in the education and AI communities, highlighting the demand for guidance on integrating generative AI into learning environments.

Technical Contributions

  • Synthesis of Benefits: The paper consolidates literature on ChatGPT's potential to promote personalized and interactive learning, and to generate prompts for formative assessment activities that provide ongoing feedback.
  • Identification of Limitations: It highlights inherent limitations such as generating wrong information, biases in training data that may augment existing biases, and privacy issues.
  • Recommendations for Leverage: The authors offer recommendations on how ChatGPT could be leveraged to maximize teaching and learning, emphasizing collaboration among stakeholders.
  • Call for Dialogue: The paper encourages policymakers, researchers, educators, and technology experts to start conversations on using evolving generative AI tools safely and constructively.

Results

As a review article, the paper does not present original empirical results or metrics. Instead, it reports on findings from existing literature, noting that ChatGPT can support personalized learning and formative assessment, but also carries risks of misinformation, bias, and privacy violations. The authors do not provide quantitative comparisons or evaluations of ChatGPT's performance in educational settings; rather, they offer a qualitative synthesis of potential benefits and challenges.

Significance

The paper's significance lies in its timely contribution to the discourse on generative AI in education. By outlining both opportunities and risks, it provides a foundation for educators and policymakers to make informed decisions about integrating ChatGPT into teaching and learning. The call for collaborative dialogue underscores the need for multidisciplinary efforts to ensure that generative AI tools are used safely and constructively. As AI continues to evolve, this paper serves as a starting point for further empirical research and policy development, ultimately aiming to enhance educational outcomes while mitigating potential harms.