Preprint
Computer Vision

Efficient diffusion models: A survey

February 1, 2025

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2025

Year

Abstract

… for diffusion models. In §5, we survey existing frameworks specifically designed for efficient diffusion models, covering their unique features, underlying libraries, and specializations. …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Diffusion models have achieved state-of-the-art results in generative tasks, but their iterative sampling process and large model sizes pose significant computational challenges. This survey addresses the critical need for a consolidated overview of efficiency techniques, which is essential for practical deployment. By organizing the field, it helps researchers quickly identify promising directions and helps practitioners choose appropriate methods for their specific constraints.

The paper's focus on frameworks is particularly timely, as the ecosystem of tools for efficient diffusion is rapidly evolving. A structured survey that compares these frameworks can save significant time and effort for developers, enabling faster prototyping and deployment.

Technical Contributions

  • Taxonomy of efficiency methods: The survey categorizes techniques into sampling acceleration (e.g., fewer steps, distillation), model compression (e.g., pruning, quantization), and architectural redesign (e.g., efficient attention, lightweight backbones).
  • Framework survey: It reviews specialized libraries and frameworks, detailing their underlying libraries (e.g., PyTorch, TensorFlow) and specializations (e.g., on-device inference, distributed training).
  • Qualitative comparison: The paper provides a comparative analysis of methods and frameworks, discussing trade-offs between speed, quality, and resource usage.

Results

As a survey, the paper does not introduce new experimental results. Instead, it synthesizes findings from existing literature, offering a qualitative assessment of various efficiency techniques. It highlights that no single method dominates; the best choice depends on the specific application and hardware constraints. The framework comparison is also qualitative, focusing on features and ease of use rather than benchmark numbers.

Significance

This survey fills a gap in the literature by providing a structured reference for efficient diffusion models. It can guide future research by identifying under-explored areas and can accelerate practical adoption by clarifying the landscape of available tools. As diffusion models continue to gain popularity, such surveys become indispensable for both academic and industrial practitioners.