Preprint
Knowledge Graphs

Graph-based approaches and functionalities in retrieval-augmented generation: A comprehensive survey

Zulun Zhu, Tiancheng Huang, Kai Wang, Junda Ye, Xinghe Chen, Siqiang Luo
January 1, 2026ACM Computing Surveys35 citations

35

Citations

1

Influential Citations

ACM Computing Surveys

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

… This survey examines how graph structures enhance retrieval-augmented generation systems by organizing external knowledge to improve large language model accuracy and reduce …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a cornerstone technique for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, reducing hallucinations and improving factual accuracy. However, traditional RAG systems often rely on flat text retrieval, which struggles with complex, multi-hop reasoning and structured knowledge. This survey, published in ACM Computing Surveys, addresses a critical gap by systematically examining how graph-based approaches can overcome these limitations. By organizing external knowledge into graph structures—such as knowledge graphs or entity-relation networks—RAG systems can leverage rich semantic relationships to retrieve more relevant and contextually appropriate information.

The significance of this work lies in its comprehensive synthesis of a rapidly growing field. As LLMs are increasingly deployed in knowledge-intensive domains like healthcare, law, and scientific research, the need for accurate, interpretable, and reliable retrieval mechanisms is paramount. Graph-based RAG offers a promising path forward by enabling models to reason over interconnected facts rather than isolated text snippets. This survey provides researchers and practitioners with a structured overview of existing methods, helping to consolidate knowledge and identify promising directions for future innovation.

Moreover, the paper highlights the interplay between graph structures and LLM capabilities, shedding light on how different graph representations (e.g., heterogeneous graphs, temporal graphs) can be tailored to specific tasks. This understanding is essential for designing next-generation AI systems that can seamlessly integrate structured and unstructured knowledge.

Technical Contributions

  • Comprehensive Taxonomy: The survey categorizes graph-based RAG approaches into distinct types based on graph construction (e.g., knowledge graphs, document graphs), retrieval strategies (e.g., graph neural networks, random walks), and integration with LLMs (e.g., prompt engineering, fine-tuning).
  • Functional Analysis: It analyzes how graph structures enhance specific RAG functionalities, including multi-hop reasoning, context aggregation, and disambiguation.
  • Comparative Evaluation: The paper compares various methods across dimensions such as scalability, accuracy, and computational efficiency, providing insights into trade-offs.
  • Open Challenges: It identifies key challenges, including graph construction from unstructured text, dynamic graph updates, and evaluation benchmarks.
  • Future Directions: The survey outlines promising research avenues, such as integrating graph-based RAG with multimodal data and developing more efficient graph retrieval algorithms.

Results

As a survey, the paper does not present original experimental results. Instead, it synthesizes findings from the literature, reporting that graph-based RAG methods generally outperform traditional text-based RAG in tasks requiring complex reasoning. For instance, several studies show improvements in retrieval precision and answer accuracy on benchmarks like HotpotQA and WebQuestions. The survey also notes that graph neural networks (GNNs) are particularly effective for encoding graph-structured knowledge, enabling LLMs to access relevant information more efficiently. However, the paper acknowledges that direct comparisons are challenging due to varying experimental setups and metrics.

Significance

The broader impact of this survey is twofold. First, it provides a foundational reference for researchers entering the field of graph-based RAG, accelerating progress by consolidating scattered knowledge. Second, it offers practical guidance for engineers and product teams looking to build more robust RAG systems. By leveraging graph structures, future AI applications can achieve higher accuracy, better interpretability, and improved handling of complex queries. This could lead to more trustworthy AI assistants, advanced question-answering systems, and enhanced decision-support tools across industries. Ultimately, the survey underscores the importance of structured knowledge representation in advancing the capabilities of large language models.