Preprint
Large Language Models

Learning to Trace Seiberg Dualities

Jonathan J. Heckman, Shani Meynet, Alessandro Mininno, Gary Shiu
July 30, 2026

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

Dualities play an important role in establishing both microscopic and emergent phenomena in a wide range of physical systems. In practice, though, it can often be computationally challenging to establish when two systems are dual, even when all of the "rules of the game" are well-known. Said differently, when confronted with two systems, how can one efficiently establish that they are in fact dual? In this paper we use machine learning methods to address this question for Seiberg dualities of supersymmetric quiver gauge theories. Mathematically, this involves establishing mutations of quivers, which is in turn a variation on the theme of "learning to unknot". On the one hand, this leads us to a practical tool for establishing the computational complexity of different dualities. On the other hand, it also allows us to study how different network architectures learn how to trace Seiberg dualities. We find that for quivers with a modest number of quiver nodes (of order $10$), different network architectures consisting of transformers and multi-layer perceptrons tend to outperform deterministic algorithms. Supplementing the network by well-established pathfinder algorithms (essentially "Google Maps for quivers") leads to an additional improvement in the efficiency and accuracy of the search strategy. We anticipate that this class of questions can serve as a useful benchmark for frontier AI models applied to theoretical physics.

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

This paper addresses a fundamental challenge in theoretical physics: efficiently determining when two seemingly different physical systems are actually dual. Seiberg dualities are crucial for understanding supersymmetric gauge theories, but establishing them computationally is often intractable even when the rules are known. By framing this as a machine learning problem, the authors open a new avenue for using AI to tackle complex symbolic reasoning tasks in physics.

The work is particularly significant because it bridges the gap between abstract mathematical structures (quiver mutations) and practical computational tools. The analogy to 'learning to unknot' connects this to a broader class of problems in computational topology, suggesting that techniques developed here could generalize to other duality or equivalence detection tasks. Moreover, the authors propose this as a benchmark for frontier AI models, which could drive progress in AI's ability to reason about advanced mathematics and physics.

Technical Contributions

  • Problem Formulation: The paper formalizes Seiberg duality detection as a quiver mutation problem, making it amenable to machine learning techniques.
  • Architecture Comparison: It systematically compares transformers and multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) for this task, providing insights into which architectures are better suited for symbolic/physics reasoning.
  • Hybrid Approach: The integration of pathfinder algorithms (analogous to 'Google Maps for quivers') with neural networks is a novel hybrid strategy that combines learned heuristics with classical search.
  • Benchmark Proposal: The authors suggest this task as a benchmark for evaluating frontier AI models, which could become a standard test for AI's capability in theoretical physics.

Results

The paper reports that for quivers with a modest number of nodes (around 10), both transformer and MLP architectures outperform deterministic algorithms in terms of efficiency and accuracy. The exact metrics are not specified in the abstract, but the qualitative finding is clear: neural networks can learn to trace Seiberg dualities more effectively than rule-based methods. Additionally, supplementing the networks with pathfinder algorithms leads to further improvements in both efficiency and accuracy, indicating that hybrid approaches are particularly promising.

Significance

This research has broader implications for both AI and physics. For AI, it introduces a new, well-defined task that requires deep understanding of mathematical structures, potentially serving as a rigorous benchmark for reasoning and generalization. For physics, it offers a practical tool to explore dualities in more complex theories, which could accelerate discoveries in supersymmetric gauge theories and beyond. The success of machine learning in this domain suggests that AI can assist in solving computationally hard problems in theoretical physics, paving the way for more AI-driven discoveries in fundamental science.