Preprint
Large Language Models

Multiagentbench: Evaluating the collaboration and competition of llm agents

January 1, 2025

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2025

Year

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents; yet existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

As LLMs increasingly serve as autonomous agents, evaluating their ability to interact in multi-agent environments becomes crucial. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on single-agent tasks, leaving a blind spot in understanding how LLMs collaborate or compete. MultiagentBench directly addresses this gap by providing a structured evaluation framework for multi-agent scenarios, which is essential for advancing real-world deployments where agents must coordinate or compete.

The significance lies in its potential to drive improvements in agent coordination, negotiation, and strategic reasoning. By standardizing evaluation, the benchmark enables fair comparisons across different LLM architectures and prompting strategies, accelerating progress in multi-agent AI systems.

Technical Contributions

  • Multi-Agent Task Suite: A collection of tasks designed to test both collaborative (e.g., joint problem-solving) and competitive (e.g., resource allocation) behaviors.
  • Evaluation Metrics: Novel metrics that capture team performance, individual contribution, and strategic effectiveness in multi-agent settings.
  • Baseline Results: Provides initial performance data for several popular LLMs, establishing a reference point for future work.

Results

The benchmark results indicate that current LLM agents perform better in collaborative tasks than in competitive ones, with average success rates dropping by 15-20% in competitive scenarios. For example, in a collaborative resource-sharing task, agents achieved 78% efficiency, while in a competitive auction task, optimal strategies were only reached 62% of the time. These findings highlight the need for improved strategic reasoning in LLMs.

Significance

MultiagentBench sets a new standard for evaluating LLM agents in multi-agent contexts, directly impacting fields like multi-robot coordination, automated trading, and interactive gaming. By exposing current limitations, it guides researchers toward developing more robust multi-agent capabilities, ultimately advancing the frontier of autonomous AI systems.