Preprint
Machine Learning

Opportunities and challenges in deep learning adversarial robustness: A survey

July 1, 2020

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2020

Year

Abstract

… We focus on the aspects that are most relevant to the discussion of adversarial robustness. … They were able to use their solver to prove/disprove local adversarial robustness for their …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Adversarial robustness is a critical concern for deploying deep learning models in security-sensitive applications. This survey provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the field, synthesizing a large body of work on adversarial attacks and defenses. By focusing on opportunities and challenges, it helps researchers identify open problems and practitioners understand the current state of the art.

The paper emphasizes formal verification as a promising direction for guaranteeing robustness, contrasting with heuristic defenses that are often circumvented by stronger attacks. This perspective is valuable because it highlights the need for rigorous, provable guarantees rather than empirical robustness alone.

Technical Contributions

The survey's key contributions include:

  • Taxonomy of adversarial attacks: Categorization based on threat model (e.g., white-box vs. black-box), attack goals (e.g., misclassification, targeted), and perturbation constraints (e.g., Lp norms).
  • Review of defense strategies: Covering adversarial training, input preprocessing, certified defenses, and detection methods.
  • Formal verification discussion: Detailed analysis of using solvers (e.g., SMT, MILP) to prove or disprove local adversarial robustness for a given input and perturbation region.
  • Identification of challenges: Including scalability of verification, trade-offs between robustness and accuracy, and the arms race between attacks and defenses.

Results

As a survey, the paper does not present new experimental results. However, it synthesizes findings from prior studies, noting that formal verification solvers can successfully prove or disprove local robustness for small to medium-sized networks. The survey also discusses empirical results showing that many proposed defenses are later broken by stronger attacks, underscoring the difficulty of achieving robust models.

Significance

This survey serves as a foundational reference for researchers entering the field of adversarial robustness. By outlining both opportunities and challenges, it encourages the development of more rigorous and scalable verification methods. Its impact extends beyond academia, informing best practices for deploying robust AI systems in real-world applications where security is paramount.