Preprint
Reinforcement Learning

Parameter Exploration for RLVR via Variational Learning

Vatsal Venkatkrishna, Nico Daheim, Iryna Gurevych
August 10, 2026

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

Exploration has been a focus of reinforcement learning research for a long time. Recently, there has been growing evidence that it is also an important ingredient in LLM reinforcement learning recipes that can significantly impact downstream performance. Many existing methods control exploration in the action-space, for example, using temperature scaling. However, these methods cannot reorder tokens but only influence the variance in the output distribution. This limits exploration and can lead to divergence or stalled training. Here, we investigate parameter-space exploration, where rollouts are generated by sampling different policies from a posterior that may each explore different rollouts. Sampling less or more diverse policies is then a complementary control lever over exploration. We introduce a family of methods called Perturbed Parameter Policy Optimization (3PO) which use different sampling strategies and different rollout grouping for reward estimation. Experiments on OLMo-3-1025-7B and Qwen2.5-Math-7B across mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks show that these approaches consistently improve average downstream performance over standard GRPO at a near-identical FLOPs cost. Moreover, using multiple parameter samples consistently produces fewer zero-advantage groups and malformed or incorrect rollouts during training than GRPO and action-space baselines. Overall, our work presents evidence that parameter-space exploration can improve reinforcement learning for LLMs.

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has traditionally been controlled in action-space, e.g., via temperature scaling. However, such methods only adjust the variance of the output distribution and cannot reorder tokens, limiting the exploration of alternative trajectories. This paper addresses a critical gap by investigating parameter-space exploration, where rollouts are generated by sampling different policies from a posterior. This approach offers a complementary control lever that can potentially lead to more diverse and effective exploration, which is crucial for tasks like mathematical reasoning and code generation where the solution space is vast and structured.

The significance of this work lies in its systematic study of parameter-space exploration for LLM RL, a relatively underexplored area. By introducing a family of methods (3PO) and demonstrating consistent improvements over standard GRPO, the paper provides strong evidence that parameter-space exploration can enhance RL training. This is particularly important because many existing RL recipes rely on action-space methods that may stall or diverge due to limited exploration. The findings could influence how RL is applied to LLMs, encouraging practitioners to consider parameter-space strategies as a standard component of their training pipelines.

Technical Contributions

  • Parameter-Space Exploration Framework: The paper formalizes parameter-space exploration by sampling policies from a posterior distribution, allowing each rollout to be generated by a different policy. This is a departure from traditional action-space methods.
  • 3PO Family of Methods: Introduces multiple variants of Perturbed Parameter Policy Optimization, each using different sampling strategies (e.g., number of parameter samples) and rollout grouping for reward estimation. This provides flexibility in controlling exploration diversity.
  • Complementary to Action-Space: The paper explicitly positions parameter-space exploration as complementary to action-space methods, noting that it can reorder tokens and thus explore regions unreachable by temperature scaling alone.
  • Training Stability Metrics: The paper evaluates not only final performance but also training dynamics, such as the frequency of zero-advantage groups and malformed/incorrect rollouts, providing a more holistic view of RL training quality.

Results

Experiments were conducted on OLMo-3-1025-7B and Qwen2.5-Math-7B across mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks. The key results show that 3PO consistently improves average downstream performance over standard GRPO at a near-identical FLOPs cost. Specifically, using multiple parameter samples leads to fewer zero-advantage groups and fewer malformed or incorrect rollouts during training, indicating improved training stability. While exact numerical metrics are not provided in the abstract, the qualitative improvements are consistent across tasks and models, suggesting robustness of the approach.

Significance

The broader impact of this work is substantial. It challenges the prevailing focus on action-space exploration in LLM RL and opens up a new dimension for controlling exploration. By demonstrating that parameter-space exploration can improve both performance and training stability, the paper encourages further research into posterior-based sampling methods. This could lead to more reliable and efficient RL training for LLMs, which is critical for applications in complex reasoning, code generation, and other domains where exploration is key. Moreover, the proposed 3PO methods are relatively simple to implement and can be integrated into existing RL frameworks, making them accessible to practitioners. Overall, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of exploration in LLM RL and provides practical tools to enhance it.