ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
0
Citations
0
Influential Citations
—
Venue
2026
Year
Rib fractures are common and time-consuming to localize on computed tomography (CT). We ask whether fractures detected independently in two orthogonal CT-derived projections (anteroposterior and lateral) can be paired across views and triangulated into reliable 3D points at a controlled rate of false outputs, and we answer it with a staged diagnostic study. The projection geometry is exact, and given correct correspondence, localization is accurate (median 4.0 mm, 88% within 10 mm, 93.6% rib-exact). On a sealed 55-case cohort, a large share of fractures is in principle recoverable (61.1% dual-view availability, and a correct pair present in the candidate graph for 58.4% of fractures), yet the binding limitation is neither geometry nor localization but confidence-limited cross-view correspondence. A controlled detector-by-correspondence factorial attributes the operational gain to lateral-detector quality rather than the tested matching methods; retraining the lateral detector produces the first nonzero controlled-budget reconstructions. Under a deliberately conservative commitment policy, a pre-specified sealed pass promotes 15 of 601 fractures to correct 3D localizations at 0.436 false points per case (2.50% end-to-end commitment yield), and committed points are accurate (median 1.49 mm, 93% rib-exact). The low yield is a consequence of confidence-gated abstention, not of geometry or detection: the study establishes a reproducible framework for selective 3D localization and identifies cross-view correspondence as the dominant operational bottleneck.
Rib fracture detection on CT is clinically important but time-consuming. This paper tackles the challenge of 3D localization using only two orthogonal 2D projections, which is a novel and efficient approach compared to full 3D processing. The study's staged diagnostic design is rigorous, separating the contributions of detection, correspondence, and geometry. It clearly identifies cross-view correspondence as the main bottleneck, which is a critical insight for the field. The paper also introduces a conservative commitment policy that yields high precision at the cost of recall, which is practical for clinical use where false positives are costly.
The study reports that with perfect correspondence, localization is accurate (median 4.0 mm, 88% within 10 mm, 93.6% rib-exact). However, on the sealed cohort, only 61.1% of fractures have dual-view availability, and a correct pair exists for 58.4%. The end-to-end commitment policy yields 15 correct localizations out of 601 fractures (2.50% yield) with 0.436 false points per case. The median error for committed points is 1.49 mm, with 93% rib-exactness. The factorial experiment shows that retraining the lateral detector is the only intervention that produces nonzero controlled-budget reconstructions, highlighting the importance of detector quality.
This paper provides a reproducible framework for selective 3D localization that can be applied to other anatomical structures or imaging modalities. It underscores the need for robust cross-view correspondence methods, which are often overlooked in favor of detection improvements. The conservative commitment policy offers a practical trade-off for clinical deployment, where precision is paramount. The study's methodology—staged evaluation and sealed cohorts—sets a standard for future research in multi-view medical imaging. By identifying the bottleneck, it guides future work toward improving correspondence, potentially unlocking higher yields without compromising accuracy.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba