ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
266
Citations
9
Influential Citations
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Venue
2024
Year
With extensive pretrained knowledge and high-level general capabilities, large language models (LLMs) emerge as a promising avenue to augment reinforcement learning (RL) in aspects, such as multitask learning, sample efficiency, and high-level task planning. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature in LLM-enhanced RL and summarize its characteristics compared with conventional RL methods, aiming to clarify the research scope and directions for future studies. Utilizing the classical agent-environment interaction paradigm, we propose a structured taxonomy to systematically categorize LLMs' functionalities in RL, including four roles: information processor, reward designer, decision-maker, and generator. For each role, we summarize the methodologies, analyze the specific RL challenges that are mitigated and provide insights into future directions. Finally, the comparative analysis of each role, potential applications, prospective opportunities, and challenges of the LLM-enhanced RL are discussed. By proposing this taxonomy, we aim to provide a framework for researchers to effectively leverage LLMs in the RL field, potentially accelerating RL applications in complex applications, such as robotics, autonomous driving, and energy systems.
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text, leveraging extensive pretrained knowledge. Reinforcement learning (RL), while powerful, often struggles with sample efficiency, multitask learning, and high-level planning. This survey bridges these two fields by systematically reviewing how LLMs can enhance RL. Given the rapid growth of research at the intersection of LLMs and RL, a structured taxonomy is timely and essential for clarifying the landscape and guiding future work.
The paper's significance lies in its comprehensive categorization of LLM roles in RL, which helps researchers navigate the burgeoning literature. By identifying four distinct roles—information processor, reward designer, decision-maker, and generator—the authors provide a clear framework that highlights how LLMs can address specific RL challenges. This taxonomy not only organizes existing methods but also reveals gaps and opportunities for future research.
Moreover, the survey emphasizes practical applications in complex domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, and energy systems, where RL is increasingly deployed. By leveraging LLMs' high-level reasoning and generalization, these applications could become more robust and efficient. Thus, this paper serves as a foundational reference for both RL and LLM communities, fostering cross-disciplinary innovation.
As a survey, this paper does not present empirical results. Instead, it offers a qualitative comparative analysis of the four roles, discussing their strengths, weaknesses, and applicability. The authors synthesize findings from existing literature to illustrate how LLMs can enhance RL in aspects like multitask learning, sample efficiency, and high-level task planning. The paper also identifies potential applications and challenges, such as computational overhead, interpretability, and safety, providing a balanced view of the field's current state.
The proposed taxonomy provides a common language for researchers to discuss and compare LLM-enhanced RL methods, facilitating collaboration and accelerating progress. By clarifying the roles LLMs can play, the survey helps practitioners select appropriate techniques for their specific RL problems. Furthermore, the discussion of applications in robotics, autonomous driving, and energy systems highlights the practical relevance of this research. As LLMs continue to evolve, their integration with RL is expected to yield more capable and generalizable agents, and this survey lays the groundwork for such advancements by organizing the field and pointing toward future research directions.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba