Preprint
Large Language Models

Synthetic data generation framework for quality control automation in gravure printing

Korota Arsène Coulibaly, Mohamed Hamlich, Khalid Hmali, Andrea Trombin
July 23, 2026

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

Quality control in printing, particularly in rotogravure printing, still depends on slow, costly, and subjective manual inspection. Automated surface defect detection is critical for maintaining high-quality standards in rotogravure printing. Deep learning models give prospects for automation. However, training robust deep learning models, such as YOLO or Vision Transformers, is heavily hindered by the extreme scarcity of real-world industrial defects images. To overcome this limitation, this paper introduces a novel synthetic data generation framework tailored for rotogravure printing quality control. The proposed pipeline automatically generates high-fidelity images of specific printing defects (creases, streaks, misregistration, etc.) and outputs corresponding bounding boxes and annotations. To validate the framework, a synthetic dataset of 7533 images was generated and used to train the state-of-the-art object-detection model RFDETR. Experimental results demonstrate that the model trained on our synthetic data achieves a Mean Average Precision (mAP) of 80.9\% on real industrial testing samples. This framework provides a zero-cost, rapid-deployment solution for automating defect inspection in printing lines without requiring massive manual data collection.

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Quality control in rotogravure printing remains a bottleneck due to reliance on manual inspection, which is slow, costly, and subjective. While deep learning offers a path to automation, the extreme scarcity of real-world defect images severely limits model training. This paper directly addresses that data scarcity problem with a synthetic data generation framework, enabling robust defect detection without the need for massive manual data collection. The approach is particularly timely as industries seek to adopt AI for manufacturing quality assurance but are often stymied by data availability.

The significance extends beyond printing: the framework demonstrates a generalizable paradigm for generating synthetic training data for industrial defect detection, where real defect examples are rare and expensive to obtain. By achieving 80.9% mAP on real samples using only synthetic training data, the paper provides strong evidence that synthetic data can bridge the gap between lab research and real-world deployment.

Technical Contributions

  • Synthetic data pipeline: Automatically generates high-fidelity images of specific printing defects (creases, streaks, misregistration) with corresponding bounding boxes and annotations, eliminating manual labeling.
  • Zero-cost deployment: The framework requires no manual data collection or annotation, enabling rapid deployment in production lines.
  • Model validation: Uses RFDETR, a state-of-the-art object-detection model, trained on 7533 synthetic images and tested on real industrial samples.

Results

The key result is a Mean Average Precision (mAP) of 80.9% on real industrial testing samples when the model is trained exclusively on synthetic data. This metric demonstrates that the synthetic data is sufficiently realistic to generalize to real-world defects, a critical requirement for practical deployment. The paper does not report comparisons with models trained on real data (likely due to scarcity), but the absolute mAP value suggests strong detection performance.

Significance

This work has immediate practical impact for the printing industry, offering a cost-effective and rapid path to automated quality control. More broadly, it contributes to the growing body of evidence that synthetic data can effectively train deep learning models for industrial vision tasks where real data is scarce. The framework's zero-cost, rapid-deployment nature makes it particularly attractive for small and medium manufacturers who cannot afford extensive data collection campaigns. Future work could extend the approach to other printing processes or defect types, further expanding its applicability.