ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
0
Citations
0
Influential Citations
—
Venue
2026
Year
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) enables LLMs to solve complex tasks through iterative tool interactions. However, existing reinforcement learning methods often rely on trajectory-level supervision, limiting fine-grained credit assignment in long-horizon TIR scenarios. On-policy self-distillation offers denser signals through teacher branches with privileged context, but existing approaches typically derive such context from ground-truth answers or retrieved skills, which may not reflect the states actually visited by the agent. Moreover, token-level supervision fails to capture the turn-level structure of tool interactions. To address this, we propose TurnSight, a turn-level hindsight self-distillation framework that derives supervision directly from execution-conditioned hindsight. It then constructs multiple hindsight views with different lookahead horizons and selects reliable supervision through cross-horizon directional agreement. Finally, the selected hindsight signal is normalized across sibling rollouts and used to adaptively modulate RL advantages while preserving their original optimization direction. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of TurnSight. Our codes are available at https://github.com/quchangle1/TurnSight.
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) is a critical capability for LLMs to solve complex, multi-step tasks by interacting with external tools. However, training LLMs for TIR via reinforcement learning (RL) suffers from sparse and coarse feedback, especially in long-horizon scenarios where trajectory-level rewards fail to pinpoint which specific tool calls or reasoning steps contributed to success or failure. This paper addresses this fundamental limitation by introducing turn-level supervision, which aligns with the natural structure of tool interactions. The proposed TurnSight framework is significant because it moves beyond trajectory-level and token-level supervision, offering a more granular and interpretable training signal that could lead to more sample-efficient and robust LLM reasoning.
Moreover, the paper tackles a common pitfall in self-distillation: using privileged context from ground-truth answers or retrieved skills that may not match the agent's actual visited states. By deriving hindsight from execution-conditioned states, TurnSight ensures the teacher's guidance is grounded in the agent's real experience, making the supervision more relevant and actionable. This is a novel perspective that could influence future RL algorithms for LLMs, particularly in interactive environments.
The abstract states that extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of TurnSight, but it does not provide specific numerical results. Typically, such benchmarks for TIR include tasks like mathematical reasoning, multi-hop QA, or agent-based tool use. Without concrete metrics, it is difficult to quantify the improvement over baselines. However, the fact that the paper was accepted (or posted) with this claim suggests that the gains are statistically significant. Future readers should consult the full paper for detailed comparisons against methods like trajectory-level RL, token-level distillation, and other self-distillation baselines.
TurnSight contributes to the growing body of research on improving LLM reasoning through better training signals. By focusing on turn-level structure, it offers a more natural and efficient way to supervise tool interactions, which are becoming increasingly important in real-world applications like code execution, database querying, and web browsing. The idea of execution-conditioned hindsight and cross-horizon agreement could be generalized beyond TIR to other sequential decision-making tasks. This work may inspire further exploration into hierarchical supervision and multi-horizon consistency in RL for LLMs, potentially leading to more capable and reliable AI agents.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba