LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks (April 2026) logo

LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks (April 2026)

Free

Evaluates agents on compositional, real-world assistant tasks requiring planning, tool use, and recovery — closer to production deployment scenarios than static QA benchmarks

FreeFree tier
Type
Open Source

About LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks (April 2026)

LiveClawBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM agents on complex, real-world assistant tasks with dual fidelity: faithfulness both to the distribution of real assistant tasks and to the execution semantics of the environments in which those tasks unfold. It addresses the limitations of existing benchmarks that often lose fidelity by underrepresenting real-world difficulties such as cross-service dependency, contaminated state, implicit intent, and runtime change, or by using endpoints that remove sessions, artifacts, state transitions, and downstream side effects. LiveClawBench combines a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework for difficulty-driven task construction with reproducible full-stack mock applications that preserve stateful execution semantics. It includes 134 executable cases across 10 domains with 22 mocked services, supporting controlled, extensible, and factor-level diagnostic evaluation of realistic agentic tasks. The benchmark resources (benchmark code, leaderboard, and trajectories) are publicly released.

Key Features

Dual-fidelity benchmark addressing task distribution and execution semantics
Triple-Axis Complexity Framework for difficulty-driven task construction
Reproducible full-stack mock applications preserving stateful execution semantics
134 executable cases across 10 domains with 22 mocked services
Supports controlled, extensible, and factor-level diagnostic evaluation of agentic tasks
Includes released benchmark code, leaderboard, and trajectory data

Pros & Cons

Pros
  • Directly addresses fidelity problems in existing benchmarks
  • Covers a wide range of domains with realistic cross-service dependencies
  • Reproducible environment ensures consistent evaluation across experiments
  • Factor-level diagnostic evaluation allows targeted analysis of agent weaknesses
  • Open-source release facilitates community use and extension
Cons
  • Relies on mocked services rather than live environments, which may limit ecological validity
  • Limited to 134 cases, potentially insufficient for fine-grained statistical comparisons
  • Benchmark scope is restricted to assistant-style tasks and may not generalize to other agent types

Best For

Evaluating LLM agents on open-ended, stateful, and personalized assistant tasksDiagnostic assessment of agent capabilities across multiple complexity axesComparing agent performance on realistic tasks mimicking real-world assistant scenariosResearch on agentic systems requiring planning, tool use, and recovery from errors

FAQ

What is the primary goal of LiveClawBench?
To provide a benchmark that achieves dual fidelity: faithful representation of real assistant task distributions and faithful replication of execution semantics in reproducible environments.
How many tasks and domains does LiveClawBench cover?
It includes 134 executable cases across 10 domains, supported by 22 mocked services.
Is LiveClawBench open source?
Yes, the benchmark resources (code, leaderboard, trajectories) are publicly released and freely accessible.