prompt
FreeAI prompt for Nature-style scientific writing and figure architecture
FreeFree tier
Inputs: textOutputs: text
About prompt
This is a sophisticated prompt designed for AI language models to assist in writing and structuring scientific manuscripts for Nature-family and high-impact journals. It outlines a comprehensive protocol for intake, argument engineering, and writing architecture, including an hourglass structure, productive writing order, and section defaults. The prompt emphasizes evidence-first writing, reader empathy, and structured reasoning over mere polishing.
Key Features
Core stance on evidence-first writing and never inventing results
Intake protocol to identify manuscript section, paper type, core claim, evidence, and boundaries
Hourglass writing structure with broad introduction and widening discussion
Productive writing order: Results first, then Introduction, Conclusion, etc.
Section defaults for Abstract and technical manuscripts
Emphasis on writing the argument before sentences and reader empathy
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Evidence-first approach reduces risk of fabrication
- Structured intake ensures all critical elements are addressed
- Promotes logical argument architecture before stylistic polishing
- Provides specific templates for different paper types and sections
- Emphasizes reader empathy and ease of judging the paper
Cons
- Requires the user to supply core claim, evidence, and boundaries before drafting
- Tailored specifically to Nature-family journals, may not suit all publication venues
- Assumes familiarity with scientific writing conventions and journal expectations
Best For
Writing research manuscripts for Nature-family journalsStructuring scientific arguments for high-impact publicationsDrafting abstracts using context-problem-gap-approach-result-implication-boundary patternPreparing method papers with a focus on methods firstRevising rough lab notes or Chinese-language inputs into polished English prose
FAQ
What does this prompt do?
It guides an AI language model to produce submission-grade scientific writing and figure architecture for Nature-family and high-impact journals, emphasizing structured argument building and evidence-first composition.
Do I need to provide my own data?
Yes, the prompt requires the user to supply the core claim, evidence, and boundaries; it never invents results or missing data.
Can I use this prompt for non-Nature journals?
The default structure is designed for Nature-family journals, but the principles of argument and evidence architecture can be adapted to other high-impact venues.