Why Do Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning Perspective (2026)
FreeDecomposes web agent behavior into high-level planning, low-level grounding, and replanning — PDDL-structured plans outperform NL plans but grounding remains the dominant bottleneck; a single round of exploratory replanning substantially improves task success
About Why Do Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning Perspective (2026)
This paper from ACL 2026 proposes a hierarchical planning framework to analyze failures in LLM-based web agents across three layers: high-level planning, low-level execution, and replanning. Through experiments, the authors find that structured PDDL plans produce more concise and goal-directed strategies than natural language plans, but low-level execution (perceptual grounding) remains the dominant bottleneck. A single round of exploratory replanning significantly improves task success. The work provides a principled foundation for diagnosing and advancing web agents.
Key Features
Pros & Cons
- Provides a structured, principled framework for analyzing web agent failures
- Clearly identifies that low-level execution, not just high-level reasoning, is the main bottleneck
- Offers actionable insight that replanning can improve task success
- Empirically compares PDDL and NL planning, showing advantages of structured plans
- Evaluation is limited to specific tasks and may not generalize across all web environments
- Findings are derived from LLM-based agents; applicability to other agent architectures is unclear
- Applying the framework to new agents requires manual annotation of planning stages