Why I changed Cursor to Copilot and it turned out to be the best choice — CoPilot Community
    Neura MarketNeura Market/CoPilot
    ChatGPTChatGPTClaudeClaudeGeminiGeminiCursorCursorGrokGrokPerplexityPerplexityCoPilotCoPilot
    DeepSeekDeepSeekStable DiffusionStable DiffusionMidjourneyMidjourney
    View All Directories
    OverviewRulesPromptsMCPsAgentsBlogVideosGuidesCoursesCommunityPluginsTrendingGenerate
    CoPilotCommunityWhy I changed Cursor to Copilot and it turned out to be the best choice
    Back to Community

    Why I changed Cursor to Copilot and it turned out to be the best choice

    Cobuter_Man July 10, 2025
    103 likes
    Hello everyone. I'm the creator of [APM](https://github.com/sdi2200262/agentic-project-management) and I have been trying various AI assistant tools the last year. Id say I have a fair amount of experience when it comes to using them effectively and also when it comes to terms like prompt, context engineering etc. Ive been fairly active in the r/cursor subreddit since I discovered Cursor, about November-December 2024. At first I would just post how amazing this tool is and how **I feel like I am robbing them** with how efficient and effective my workflow had become. Nowadays, im not that active here since I switched to VS Code + Copilot but I have been paying attention to how many ppl have been complaining about Cursor's billing changes feel like a scam and what not. Thank God, I managed to predict this back in May when I cancelled my sub since they had the incredibly slow queues and the product was basically unusable... now I dont have to go through **feeling like I am being robbed!** Seriously... thats the vibe ppl in that subreddit have been getting from using the product lately and it shows. All these subtle, sketchy moves on changing the billing, not explaining what "unlimited" means (since it wasnt actually unlimited) or what the rate limits were. I remember someone got as far as doing a research to see if they are actually breaking any laws and found two haha. Even if this company had the best product in the world and I would set my self back from not using it, I would still cancel my sub since **I can't stand the feeling of being scammed.** A month ago, the main argument was that: *Cursor has the best product in the world when it comes to AI assistance so they can do whatever they want and most ppl will still stay and continue using it.* However now in my opinion, this isnt even the case. Cursor *had* the best product in the world, but now other labs are catching up and maybe even getting ahead. Here is a list of the top of my head of products that actually match Cursor in performance: * Claude Code (maybe its even better in the Max Option) * VS Code + Roo OR Cline ( and also these are OPEN SOURCE and have GREAT communities and devs behind them) * **VS Code + Copilot (my personal fav + its also OPEN SOURCE)** In general, everybody knows that supporting Open Source products is better, but many times it feels like you are compromising some of the performance you can get just to be Open Source. I'd say that rn this isnt the case. I think that Open Source is catching up and actually now that hosting local LLMs in regular GPUs is starting to become a thing... its probably gonna stay that way until some tech giant decides otherwise. **Why** I **prefer Copilot:** 1. First of all, I have Copilot Pro on a free from Github Education. People are gonna come at me and say that Cursor is free for students too, but it's not. Its free for students that have a .edu email, meaning that its only free for students with from USA, UK, Canada and in general top-player countries. Countries like mine, you have to contact their support only for **Sam the LLM** to say some AI slop and just tell you to buy Pro... 2. Second of all, it operates as Cursor used to: with a standard monthly request limit. On Copilot Pro its 300 premium requests for 10 bucks. Pretty good deal for me, as ive noticed that in Copilot its ACTUALLY around 300 requests and not 150 and the rest are broken tool calls or no-answer requests. 3. Thirdly, it's actually GOOD. Since I mostly use [APM](https://github.com/sdi2200262/agentic-project-management), when doing AI assisted coding, I use multiple chat sessions at once, and I expect from my editor to offer good "agentic" behavior from its models. In Copilot, even the base model GPT 4.1 has been surprisingly stable when it comes to behaving as an Agent and not as a chat model. What do you guys think? Does Cursor have such a huge user base that they dont give a flying fuck ab the portion of the Users that will migrate to other products? I think they do, judging from the recent posts in this subreddit where they fish for User feedback and they suddenly start to become transparent ab their billing model...
    Visit

    Comments

    More Community

    View all

    MiniMax M2.5 is now available in GitHub Copilot for free and student use

    GitHub Copilot now lets Free users and students use MiniMax M2.5, but no official clients—Copilot CLI, VS Code, github.com/copilot UI, or OpenCode—display it.  However, it's in the model listing API 3 times and and usable via GitHub OAuth. The model listing API provides a lot of detail about it.  It indicates that M2.5 is being served by Fireworks, and that there's a "(Fast)" version served by Cerebras.   Both are only available to "free" and "edu" subscriptions, to compensate, one would think, for the removal of premium models from the student plan ([https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/189268).](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/189268)) Both are marked as preview, "model\_picker\_enabled=false" and "model\_picker\_category=powerful".  The ID of "MiniMax M2.5 (Fast)" is `minimax-m2p5-cb` instead of `minimax-m2p5-fw`. { "billing": { "is_premium": true, "multiplier": 1, "restricted_to": ["free", "edu"] }, "capabilities": { "family": "minimax-m2p5-fw", "limits": {"max_context_window_tokens": 196608, "max_output_tokens": 32000, "max_prompt_tokens": 164000}, "object": "model_capabilities", "supports": { "parallel_tool_calls": true, "reasoning_effort": ["low", "medium", "high"], "streaming": true, "structured_outputs": true, "tool_calls": true }, "tokenizer": "o200k_base", "type": "chat" }, "id": "accounts/msft/routers/mp3yn0h7", "is_chat_default": false, "is_chat_fallback": false, "model_picker_category": "powerful", "model_picker_enabled": false, "name": "MiniMax M2.5 (Copilot)", "object": "model", "policy": {"state": "enabled", "terms": ""}, "preview": true, "supported_endpoints": ["/chat/completions"], "vendor": "Fireworks", "version": "accounts/msft/routers/mp3yn0h7" } The reason the official clients don't show the MiniMax models is because the `model_picker_enabled` field on them is set to false.  In Piebald we weren't aware of that field, and therefore by accident we don't respect it, thus revealing these options.  They must be pretty new because we have plenty of Copilot users and none of have used MiniMax with Copilot before.

    D
    Dramatic_Squash_3502
    158

    Is this a joke? weekly rate limit of 264 hrs (11 days)?

    https://preview.redd.it/zflkaaam44vg1.png?width=462&format=png&auto=webp&s=658a1bae15dcf7428b6c993b2349fa7db4a858d1 Whats going on copilot team? **\[Update 1\]:** Tried after an hour - "Wait for 264 hrs" **\[Update 2\]:** Another try after some time - "Wait for 278 hrs" **\[Update 3\]:** Another try after some time - "Wait for 286 hrs" **\[Update 4\]:** After almost 18hrs - "Wait for 293 hrs" Copilot team wants me to take some break and go on a long vacation.. (hope I'd be sponsored) **\[Update 5 - 5:45pm IST\]:** "Wait for 301 hrs" And whats interesting is that for every such message response it costs credits, so i am trying with 0.33x models to say "hi" LOL **\[Update 6 - 11:00pm IST\]:** "You have reached your weekly rate limit. Please upgrade your plan or wait for your limit to reset on April 28" \-> wow weekly limit resets after 2 weeks. should rephrase the msg. \----------------- Usage is spread across multiple models, even including gemini 3.1, Sonnet but mainly gpt 5.4 and well within limits (15% so far should have been 50% so already way less usage), context managed as much possible, short tasks. So what they are saying has nothing to do with its, I believe its all about the shortage of their resources as the number of users have increased. And its a BUG, you cant have 300 hrs wait time for weekly limit .. or wait is it monthly limit.. but surely 15% usage wont be for monthly limit as well.

    O
    Ok-Cranberry4090
    70

    Pro+ Github blocked me for 2 days because I used their service

    I own Github Pro+ Since February and it all was working fine. Not not only they removed Opus Fast, and "reduced limits on users" to only increase limit and now I cannot do work for 2 days? I specially reviewed their ToS that they so often quote for me to check, THERE IS NOTHING IN THERE that says rate limit, Github maybe you will enlighten me how can I know If I am going too fast so that I can Plan for this? I got 71% of requests left for the month, I won't be able to use them probably...

    M
    Muchaszewski
    96

    A long-awaited Feature is here!

    GitHub Copilot CLI now supports remote sessions! https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-13-remote-control-cli-sessions-on-web-and-mobile-in-public-preview/

    M
    mabdelhafiz94
    109

    ​I built a transparent Mario game that runs OVER my IDE so I can play while waiting for Copilot to write code.

    When you're vibe coding and letting AI do the heavy lifting, the downtime gets boring fast, and continuous work is a real pain in the ass. To get a little relaxation, I built a stress-relief mini-game that lives directly on your Windows desktop as a transparent overlay, letting you stomp Goombas right on top of your open IDE. You can download the setup file from my GitHub (https://github.com/bxf1001g/desktop_mario/releases) and let it run silently in the background; just hit Ctrl+Alt+Shift+M to instantly bring the game up, press Esc to quickly hide it when you need to look busy, and hit Ctrl+Alt+Shift+M again whenever you need another break. This isn't the full version yet, just something fun I threw together as a side thing, so contributors are always welcome!

    M
    maxwellwatson1001
    268

    CoPilot Pro + VSCode extension is kinda a better deal than I expected: so far I vastly prefer GPT 5.4 Extra High to Claude Opus 4.6 and I'm only at 6% usage after at least like five hours of heavy work with it

    CoPilot Pro + VSCode extension is kinda a better deal than I expected: so far I vastly prefer GPT 5.4 Extra High to Claude Opus 4.6 and I'm only at 6% usage after at least like five hours of heavy work with it

    Z
    ZootAllures9111
    172

    Stay up to date

    Get the latest CoPilot prompts, rules, and resources delivered to your inbox weekly.

    Neura Market LogoNeura Market

    Discover the best AI prompts, plugins, and resources for CoPilot and more.

    Content Types

    • Rules
    • Prompts
    • MCPs
    • Agents
    • Guides

    Platforms

    • ChatGPT Directory
    • Claude Directory
    • Gemini Directory
    • Cursor Directory
    • Grok Directory
    • Perplexity Directory
    • DeepSeek Directory
    • CoPilot Directory
    • Stable Diffusion Directory
    • Midjourney Directory
    • All Directories

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Documentation
    • Help Center
    • Marketplace

    Legal

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service

    © 2026 Neura Market. All rights reserved.

    |

    Not affiliated with any AI platform vendors.