Apple last Friday filed a trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing the AI company of orchestrating a “pattern of misconduct” to poach confidential information from current and former Apple employees. The legal action, which TechCrunch’s Equity podcast called “the biggest news of the week,” marks a dramatic escalation in the rivalry between two of the world’s most valuable technology firms.
The lawsuit claims that more than 400 Apple employees now work at OpenAI, a figure that Anthony Ha, TechCrunch weekend editor and Equity co-host, said Apple must have solid numbers on. “Even if it’s not necessarily huge in percentage terms—both companies have many thousands or tens of thousands of employees—400 people is a serious talent drain,” Ha noted on the podcast. Apple alleges that OpenAI’s highest levels directed a campaign to lure staff away and extract proprietary knowledge about Apple’s hardware and software.
OpenAI responded with a brief statement: “not aware of any evidence that this complaint has merit.” The company, which recently won a courtroom victory against Elon Musk, is now facing a far more formidable opponent in Apple.
The Hardware Ambitions at the Heart of the Dispute
Central to the lawsuit are OpenAI’s plans to enter the hardware business, starting with a mobile smart speaker. The company has allegedly been working with designer Jony Ive on the device, which Sean O’Kane, TechCrunch reporter and Equity co-host, described as “allegedly the first product” from OpenAI’s hardware division. Last year, OpenAI released a video of executives sitting at a coffee shop or bar in San Francisco, talking vaguely about hardware and legacy devices.
O’Kane suggested the lawsuit could directly impact those hardware ambitions. “Even setting aside whether or not the court grants any kind of injunctive relief or any kind of restraining order over what OpenAI is doing, it just naturally can lead to that sort of situation where it’s going to cause some delays in what OpenAI is working on,” he said. “Which I’m sure was probably part of the reasoning behind Apple doing this. They don’t do this stuff willy nilly.”
Apple’s lawsuit names Tang Tan, Apple’s chief hardware officer, among the employees it claims were targeted. The suit could be used to slow down a competing hardware product, O’Kane added, noting that Apple’s legal strategy often includes causing delays even without immediate injunctive relief.
IPO Plans Now Under a Cloud
OpenAI has filed confidentially for an initial public offering, with CEO Sam Altman using cautious language that suggests the IPO might happen as early as the end of this year or early next year. The company’s business is currently overwhelmingly software, but its hardware plans are a key part of the story it will tell bankers and investors about its addressable market.
O’Kane said the lawsuit “raises a whole bunch of questions” around the IPO. If hardware is a big part of OpenAI’s pitch to investors, the legal battle with Apple could affect IPO pricing. The suit also comes at a sensitive time: OpenAI recently won a courtroom victory against Elon Musk, but that trial involved embarrassing dirty laundry that came out in testimony.
Kirsten Korosec, TechCrunch reporter and Equity co-host, predicted OpenAI will not settle quickly. “I fully predict that OpenAI will take the lesson from the Musk trial that they can endure a trial,” she said. “Hey, we went through it and we survived and we’ll be okay if we have to do another trial with Apple.” Ha noted that the brand damage from a trial could be significant, similar to what OpenAI experienced during the Musk case, but Korosec argued the company has already learned it can weather such storms.
The Talent Drain and Its Implications
Stay ahead of the AI curve
The most important updates, news, and content — delivered weekly.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI’s misconduct goes beyond mere poaching, claiming a pattern of behavior aimed at extracting confidential information. Apple’s complaint specifically targets former Apple employees now at OpenAI, alleging they shared trade secrets.
Ha observed that the number of employees involved—more than 400—is substantial even for companies of Apple and OpenAI’s size. “That’s a serious talent drain,” he said. The figure represents a significant loss of institutional knowledge, particularly in hardware engineering, where Apple has long held a competitive advantage.
The allegations are “pretty wild,” Korosec said, but she cautioned that they remain just allegations at this stage. Apple’s decision to file suit suggests the company believes it has strong evidence, and O’Kane noted that Apple “doesn’t do this stuff willy nilly.”
Social Norms and the Future of Recording Devices
The hardware device at the center of the dispute—a mobile smart speaker—raises broader questions about privacy and social norms. Ha said that if such devices become widespread, “social norms will have to be renegotiated.” He added that people who record others without consent “should be criticized.”
O’Kane, for his part, said he is “good” with not having the device, reflecting a skepticism about the utility of always-on recording hardware. The lawsuit may slow down OpenAI’s hardware timeline, but it also highlights the growing tension between tech giants over the next generation of personal devices.
What Comes Next
The lawsuit is in its early stages, and both sides are likely preparing for a lengthy legal battle. Apple’s complaint names OpenAI and several individuals, though the full scope of the allegations will emerge as the case proceeds. The IPO timeline—end of this year or early next year—could be affected if the lawsuit leads to discovery that reveals damaging internal communications.
Korosec predicted that OpenAI will endure a trial rather than settle quickly, taking the lesson from the Musk case that they can survive courtroom scrutiny. “Hey, we went through it and we survived and we’ll be okay if we have to do another trial with Apple,” she said, quoting the likely internal sentiment at OpenAI.
The case also underscores the high stakes in the AI hardware race. Apple’s lawsuit could be used for a competing hardware product, O’Kane suggested, potentially giving Apple leverage as it develops its own AI-powered devices. The outcome could reshape the competitive landscape for both companies.
For now, the legal battle is just beginning. The allegations are serious, the stakes are high, and both Apple and OpenAI are preparing for a fight that could last years.