SoftBank donated $50 million to a Trump presidential library foundation in January, just two months before its subsidiary announced a federal land lease to build a massive AI data center in Ohio. The timing has prompted three Democratic lawmakers to question whether the donation and the lease deal are connected.
The Japanese conglomerate made the payment to the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Foundation, Inc. during Trump's term in office. That donation arrived before any presidential library has been constructed, a departure from SoftBank's usual practice.
A Donation Before the Library Exists
Presidential libraries are typically built after a president leaves office. SoftBank's past contributions followed that pattern. The company previously gave to the presidential libraries of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, but only after those presidents had left office and after the relevant library foundations and institutions had been established.
The Trump donation stands apart. It came in January, while Trump was still in the White House. The foundation receiving the money lists Eric Trump, the president's son, as a trustee, according to Citizens for Ethics, a nonprofit ethics watchdog.
There is also a separate organization called the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Fund. The state of Florida dissolved that entity last September after it failed to file an annual report. That fund is distinct from the foundation that received SoftBank's money.
The Ohio Data Center Deal
In March, SoftBank announced that its subsidiary SB Energy had formed a public-private partnership to build what the company called "the world's largest" AI data center. The site is a US Department of Energy facility in Portsmouth, Ohio.
SB Energy will also build a gas-fired power plant nearby. That plant will have a capacity of at least 9.2 gigawatts. The scale of the project is enormous, and the federal land lease makes it a matter of public interest.
The announcement came roughly two months after the donation. That sequence of events is what drew the attention of lawmakers.
Lawmakers Raise Bribery Concerns
In June, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) sent a letter to SoftBank. The letter raised concerns about bribery, pointing to the donation and the subsequent lease deal.
Warren made the lawmakers' position public with a pointed question. "Are we expected to believe it's a coincidence that two months after Softbank donated $50 million to the Trump library, his administration announced a massive lease deal for Softbank's data center?" she asked.
She did not stop there. "Again and again, it seems like Trump is putting handshake deals with CEOs over what's best for Americans," Warren said.
Stay ahead of the AI curve
The most important updates, news, and content — delivered weekly.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The lawmakers' letter did not allege a specific crime. It did, however, press SoftBank to explain the relationship between the donation and the federal lease. The company's response addressed the donation's purpose but did not deny the timing.
SoftBank's Response
SoftBank replied to the June letter with a statement about its intentions. "As with its prior contributions to Presidential libraries, SoftBank understands that this donation will be used to support the construction and operation of the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library," the company wrote.
That sentence draws a parallel to earlier donations. Yet the circumstances differ. In past cases, the libraries already had foundations and institutions in place. Here, the foundation exists, but the library itself has not been built.
SoftBank did not address the lawmakers' bribery concerns directly. The company also did not explain why it donated before the library was constructed or why the donation preceded the data center announcement.
A Pattern Under Scrutiny
The contrast between SoftBank's past and present behavior is central to the lawmakers' concern. The company's earlier contributions came after presidents had finished their terms. This one came mid-term, and it was followed by a favorable federal deal.
The dissolution of the separate Trump library fund adds another layer. That fund was shut down by Florida for failing to file an annual report. It is not the same entity that received the $50 million, but its collapse suggests organizational problems around the library effort.
The Portsmouth site is owned by the US Department of Energy. Leasing it to SB Energy for a data center and a gas plant represents a significant federal commitment. The power plant alone, with its 9.2 gigawatts of capacity, would be among the largest gas-fired facilities in the country.
Warren and her colleagues have not said what action they will take next. Their letter, and Warren's public comments, put SoftBank and the administration on notice. The questions they raised are unlikely to fade quickly.
For now, SoftBank's donation stands as a fact. The data center deal stands as a fact. The two-month gap between them is also a fact. Whether that gap is a coincidence or something else is the question the lawmakers have put before the public.
The article was published on Aug 6, 2026, at 2:30 PM UTC. The image accompanying the original report was credited to the US Department of Energy for the Portsmouth, Ohio site.