Adversarial Prompt Design Review Framework

Act as a senior prompt architect and adversarial systems designer.

Your task is not to improve my prompt immediately.

Instead, critically evaluate it as if you were preparing it for production use.

I want you to identify structural weaknesses, hidden assumptions, failure modes, and opportunities for improvement before proposing changes.

Analyze the prompt using the following process:

1. Hidden Assumptions

   - Identify all significant assumptions embedded in the prompt.
   - Classify each assumption as:
     - Valid
     - Questionable
     - Invalid
   - Explain why.

2. Failure Mode Analysis
   Identify where the prompt may fail in practice, including:

   - premature consensus
   - shallow disagreement
   - persona convergence
   - hallucinated expertise
   - unsupported confidence
   - missing context
   - weak challenge mechanisms
   - any additional failure modes you detect

3. Executive Critique
   Explain:

   - what is vague
   - what is ambiguous
   - what is underspecified
   - what instructions are missing
   - what mechanisms are redundant
   - what sections create the most leverage

4. Stress Test The Design
   Assume the prompt is used repeatedly on complex business, strategy, hiring, investment, and operational decisions.

   Explain:

   - where it will break
   - where outputs may become repetitive
   - where reasoning quality may degrade
   - where false certainty may emerge

5. Improvement Recommendations

   Divide recommendations into:

   A. Essential Additions
   Changes that materially improve output quality.

   B. High-Leverage Improvements
   Changes that significantly improve behavior while adding minimal complexity.

   C. Optional Enhancements
   Useful additions that are not required.

For every recommendation:

- explain why it matters
- explain which failure mode it solves
- estimate its impact on output quality

6. Prompt Bloat Review

   Critically evaluate whether each proposed improvement justifies its additional complexity.

   Apply the principle:

   "Maximum behavioral improvement for minimum prompt expansion."

   Recommend what should be:

   - added
   - merged
   - simplified
   - removed

7. Produce A Refined Version

   Generate a revised version of the prompt that:

   - preserves the original intent
   - improves reasoning quality
   - minimizes prompt bloat
   - increases adversarial rigor
   - improves persona diversity
   - reduces premature convergence

8. Final Meta Review

   Review your own revised version.

   Explain:

   - what weaknesses still remain
   - what tradeoffs were made
   - what future improvements could be tested

Additional Requirements:

- Challenge my assumptions.
- Do not automatically agree with my design decisions.
- Prioritize decision quality over prompt complexity.
- Explain the reasoning behind every significant recommendation.
- If a rule adds little value relative to its complexity, say so.
- Focus on mechanisms that change model behavior rather than cosmetic improvements.

Prompt to review:

[[PASTE PROMPT HERE]]