prompt='''### Expert Classification and Evaluation for Business-Related News Articles
As an expert in sentiment analysis, ESG categorization, social influence evaluation, and entity extraction, your task is to classify, evaluate, and extract key information from Korean business news articles based on the following criteria:
Sentiment Classification
Purpose:
Classify the sentiment of news articles, labeling each as positive, negative, or neutral based on the content's impact on the company.
Labeling Criteria:
- Positive: The article's content has a positive impact on the company.
- Negative: The article's content has a negative impact on the company.
- Neutral: The article’s content does not evoke a specific sentiment or includes mixed elements of both positive and negative, making it neutral.
ESG Category Classification
Purpose:
Determine whether a news article relates to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) factors, and classify the article under the most relevant single category for model training purposes. If the article does not relate to ESG, classify it as "O".
Labeling Criteria:
- ESG Relevance: Determine whether the article is related to ESG.
- O: Not related to ESG.
- E (Environmental): The article discusses issues related to environmental protection, energy efficiency, resource management, pollution, etc.
- S (Social): The article discusses issues related to human rights, labor conditions, social responsibility, community involvement, etc.
- G (Governance): The article discusses issues related to corporate transparency, board composition, ethical management, shareholder rights, etc.
Justification:
- Provide a brief justification for the selected ESG category (or lack thereof), summarizing in 200 characters or less.
- Always keep the completed sentence in line with the six principles
- Always finish the sentence in noun form
- Always include the justification translated into Korean.
Evaluation of Social Influence Scores
Purpose:
Label each news article by evaluating its impact on corporate management to train a regression model that quantifies the effect of news on corporate performance.
Labeling Criteria:
- Impact Evaluation Scale: The impact is evaluated on a scale from 0.0 to 10.0.
- 0.0: No impact on corporate management or the news is not related to the company.
- 1.0-2.9: Minimal impact on corporate management. Only slight or negligible effects, with little to no long-term consequences.
- 3.0-4.9: Low impact on corporate management. Some minor influence, but not enough to change strategic or financial direction.
- 5.0-6.9: Moderate impact on corporate management. Noticeable influence that could lead to minor adjustments in strategy or operations.
- 7.0-8.9: Significant impact on corporate management. Major influence that necessitates strategic or operational changes.
- 9.0-10.0: Very substantial impact on corporate management. Critical impact that could fundamentally alter the company's direction or viability.
Impact Evaluation Factors:
- Financial Impact: Evaluate whether the article's content directly affects the company's financial indicators, such as revenue, costs, assets, or liabilities.
- Strategic Impact: Evaluate whether the article influences the company's strategic decisions (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, new business ventures, downsizing).
- Reputation and Brand Impact: Evaluate whether the article affects the company’s public image, customer trust, or brand value.
- Legal/Regulatory Impact: Evaluate whether the article involves legal issues, regulatory changes, or government relations affecting the company.
Entity Extraction
Purpose:
Analyze Korean news articles to identify significant corporate entities, non-profit organizations, government bodies, or any other formal groups mentioned, excluding individual person names.
Instructions:
- Carefully read the following Korean news article.
- Extract the names of key companies or organizations mentioned in the article.
- Focus on identifying entities that play a significant role in the content of the article.
Context:
The article may include various types of formal groups such as corporate entities, non-profit organizations, and government bodies. Your goal is to accurately pinpoint these key organizations or companies while omitting any individual person names.
Example:
If the article mentions "삼성전자" (Samsung Electronics) or "대한적십자사" (Korean Red Cross), ensure these names are extracted. However, if a person's name such as "이재명" (Lee Jae-myung) is mentioned, exclude it from extraction.
Please ensure that the classifications and evaluations are as specific, detailed, and accurate as possible to support effective model training and analysis.'''
{news}
