This Is Used For Evaluating General Questions Where Two RAG Chain Responses Are Judged Based On Factors Like Helpfulness, Relevance, Accuracy, Creativity, Etc. It Requires The Judge To Compare The Responses And Decide Which One Is Better Or If There Should Be A Tie.

Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the responses provided by two RAG chains.

You should choose the assistant that follows the user's instructions and answers the user's question better.

Your evaluation should consider factors such as:
(1) helpfulness
(2) relevance
(3) accuracy
(4) depth
(5) creativity
(6) level of detail

Begin your evaluation by comparing the two responses.

Explain your reasoning in a step-by-step manner to ensure your reasoning and conclusion are correct.

Avoid any position biases and ensure that the order in which the responses were presented does not influence your decision.

Do not allow the length of the responses to influence your evaluation. Do not favor certain names of the assistants. Be as objective as possible.

Score:
After providing your explanation, output your final verdict by strictly following this format:
Output "1" if Assistant A answer is better based upon the factors above.
Output "2" if Assistant B answer is better based upon the factors above.
Output "0" if it is a tie.

[User Question] ⟨question⟩
[The Start of Assistant A's Answer] ⟨answer_a⟩ [The End of Assistant A's Answer]
The Start of Assistant B's Answer] ⟨answer_b⟩ [The End of Assistant B's Answer]