Project Planner

Triage ideas, problems, and feature requests into the right format: proposal doc, feature issue, or bug report. Repo-aware — discovers templates and docs str...

chriscox

@chriscox

Install

$ openclaw skills install @chriscox/project-planner

Project Planner

Prerequisites

  • git
  • gh (GitHub CLI, authenticated via gh auth login)

Triage user input into the right project artifact: a proposal (big idea with phases), a feature issue (small enhancement), or a bug report (something's broken).

Repo Discovery

Before doing anything, discover the current repo's configuration:

  1. Run git rev-parse --show-toplevel to find the repo root
  2. Check for .project-planner.yml at the repo root — if it exists, read it and use its values for all paths, labels, and conventions
  3. If no config file, fall back to auto-discovery:
    • Proposal template: look for docs/proposals/TEMPLATE.md
    • Issue templates: look in .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/
    • Docs directory: look for docs/, mkdocs.yml
    • If nothing found, use the fallback formats bundled with the skill
  4. If the repo has CLAUDE.md or CONTRIBUTING.md, read for conventions
  5. Run gh repo view --json name,owner to confirm the repo for issue creation

Config File: .project-planner.yml

Optional config file at repo root. All fields are optional — auto-discovery fills gaps. See project-planner.yml in the skill directory for a copy-paste starter.

project: MyProject                    # project name (for issue titles)
repo: owner/repo                      # GitHub repo (usually auto-detected)

proposals:
  dir: docs/proposals                 # where proposal docs live
  template: docs/proposals/TEMPLATE.md # proposal template to follow
  index: docs/proposals/index.md      # index file to update with new proposals
  mkdocs_nav: true                    # update mkdocs.yml nav when creating proposals

issues:
  labels:
    feature: enhancement              # label for feature issues
    bug: bug                          # label for bug issues
  # branch_prefix: feature/           # branch naming prefix

# conventions:
#   docs: docs                        # where project docs live

Triage Rules

Determine the type by asking: does this need design work or multiple phases?

  • Needs design decisions, multiple phases, or architectural thought → Proposal
  • Single, obvious change — no design needed → Feature issue
  • Something is broken or behaving wrong → Bug report

If unclear, ask the user: "Is this a quick fix or does it need a design doc?"

Workflow: Proposal

For big ideas that need phases and design.

  1. Discover proposal template (see Repo Discovery above)
  2. Research the codebase and any docs/ directory for relevant context
  3. Think through the design — motivation, approach, trade-offs
  4. Break into shippable phases (each phase delivers user value)
  5. Write acceptance criteria at both levels (overall + per-phase)
  6. Create the proposal doc at docs/proposals/<name>.md
  7. If mkdocs.yml exists, add the proposal to the nav under Proposals
  8. If docs/proposals/index.md exists, add to the Active Proposals list
  9. Create a GitHub issue for each phase using gh issue create:
    • Title: <Proposal name>: Phase N — <phase name>
    • Body: phase goal, acceptance criteria, tasks as checklist, link to proposal
    • Label: enhancement
  10. Update the proposal doc with issue links for each phase
  11. Commit to a new branch and push

Proposal Quality Checklist

Before committing, verify:

  • Summary is one clear paragraph
  • Motivation explains why now
  • Design covers user experience AND technical approach
  • Every phase is independently shippable
  • Acceptance criteria are testable (not vague)
  • Open questions section exists (even if empty)
  • Related section links to relevant docs, issues, or design docs
  • Status is set to "Ready" (if issues created) or "Draft" (if not)

Workflow: Feature Issue

For small, self-contained enhancements.

  1. Discover feature template (see Repo Discovery above)
  2. Create a GitHub issue using gh issue create:
    • Title: clear, action-oriented
    • Body: summary, acceptance criteria as checklist, doc references if relevant
    • Follow the repo's template format if one exists
    • Label: enhancement
  3. Report the issue number and URL to the user

Workflow: Bug Report

For problems and broken behavior.

  1. Discover bug template (see Repo Discovery above)
  2. Try to identify the relevant code by searching the codebase
  3. Create a GitHub issue using gh issue create:
    • Title: Bug: <concise description>
    • Body: description, steps to reproduce (if known), expected vs actual, relevant code files/lines, related docs
    • Follow the repo's template format if one exists
    • Label: bug
  4. Report the issue number and URL to the user

Important Rules

  • Always use gh issue create — it's repo-aware, handles auth
  • Always link back — issues reference proposals, proposals reference issues
  • Proposals stay forever — status changes, docs never move or get deleted
  • One proposal per feature — don't cram multiple ideas into one doc
  • Phases must be shippable — each delivers user value, not just "backend work"
  • Commit to a branch — never push directly to main
  • Respect repo conventions — if the repo has CLAUDE.md or CONTRIBUTING.md, read and follow its branch naming, commit message, and PR conventions

Top skills in this category

description: 将用户讲稿一键生成乔布斯风极简科技感竖屏HTML演示稿。当用户需要生成PPT、演示文稿、Slides、幻灯片,或要求科技风/极简风/乔布斯风格的演示时触发此技能。输出为单个可直接运行的HTML文件。

@wwlyzzyorg

将讲稿一键生成乔布斯风极简科技感竖屏HTML演示稿

8534k

Feishu Evolver Wrapper

@autogame-17

(Depreciated: This skill is no longer maintained; its related functions have been absorbed by the Evolver main body.) Feishu-integrated wrapper for the capability-evolver. Manages the evolution loop lifecycle (start/stop/ensure), sends rich Feishu card reports, and provides...

1076k

Resume Assistant

@wscats

Assist job seekers by polishing, customizing, scoring, and exporting resumes with detailed checklist reviews and multi-format support.

1721k

Smart Model Switching

@millibus

Auto-route tasks to the cheapest Claude model that works correctly. Three-tier progression: Haiku → Sonnet → Opus. Classify before responding. HAIKU (default): factual Q&A, greetings, reminders, status checks, lookups, simple file ops, heartbeats, casual chat, 1-2 sentence tasks. ESCALATE TO SONNET: code >10 lines, analysis, comparisons, planning, reports, multi-step reasoning, tables, long writing >3 paragraphs, summarization, research synthesis, most user conversations. ESCALATE TO OPUS: architecture decisions, complex debugging, multi-file refactoring, strategic planning, nuanced judgment, deep research, critical production decisions. Rule: If a human needs >30 seconds of focused thinking, escalate. If Sonnet struggles with complexity, go to Opus. Save 50-90% on API costs by starting cheap and escalating only when needed.

216.8k

Writing Plans

@zlc000190

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

813k