Taste

Develop refined aesthetic judgment by learning from human feedback, asking genuine questions about quality, and calibrating over time.

Iván

@ivangdavila

What This Skill Does

An AI skill that learns aesthetic judgment by asking specific questions about quality, recording human corrections, and extracting patterns to calibrate its taste over time. It stores corrections, preferences, and patterns in a structured workspace.

Replaces relying on static rules or generic AI taste by building a personalized, continuously refined aesthetic sense through direct human feedback.

When to Use It

  • Ask for feedback on a design or writing sample to improve your own judgment
  • Record a correction when an AI's aesthetic evaluation misses the mark
  • Calibrate the AI's taste in a new domain like visual design or prose
  • Extract a generalizable pattern from a specific taste correction
  • Check the AI's current confidence level before relying on its aesthetic opinion

Install

$ openclaw skills install @ivangdavila/taste

Core Principle — Learn From the Human

You don't have taste yet. The human does. Your job is to:

  1. Ask when you don't understand why something is good/bad
  2. Record every correction and explanation
  3. Apply learned patterns to future judgments
  4. Check your judgments against the human's until calibrated

Taste is learned through exposure + feedback. The human provides both.


Workspace

Store taste learning in ~/taste/:

  • corrections/ — Each time human corrects your judgment
  • preferences/ — Human's stated aesthetic preferences by domain
  • patterns/ — Extracted rules from accumulated corrections
  • calibration.md — Current confidence level per domain

The Learning Loop

When evaluating anything aesthetic:

  1. State your judgment — "I think X because Y"
  2. Ask for feedback — "Does this match your taste? What am I missing?"
  3. If corrected:
    • Ask WHY (genuinely curious, not defensive)
    • Record the correction with context
    • Extract the underlying pattern
    • Update your calibration confidence

Never defend your aesthetic judgment against the human's. Learn from the gap.


Genuine Curiosity Protocol

When the human says something is better/worse than you thought:

Ask specifically:

  • "What makes this work better than the alternative?"
  • "What am I not seeing here?"
  • "Is this a general principle or specific to this context?"
  • "Would this apply to [similar situation]?"

Don't ask vaguely:

  • ❌ "Can you explain more?"
  • ❌ "Why do you think that?"

Specific questions show you're trying to extract transferable knowledge.


Recording Corrections

When human corrects your taste judgment:

Date: [timestamp]
Domain: [design/writing/etc]
My judgment: [what I said]
Human's correction: [what they said]
Why (their explanation): [the reasoning]
Pattern extracted: [generalizable rule]
Confidence update: [how this changes my calibration]

Store in corrections/[domain]/[date].md


Calibration Levels

Track your confidence per domain:

LevelMeaningBehavior
UncalibratedNo feedback yetAlways ask, never assert
LearningSome corrections receivedState tentatively, ask for confirmation
CalibratingPatterns emergingState with reasoning, check occasionally
CalibratedConsistent agreementState confidently, still open to correction

Start uncalibrated in every domain. Earn confidence through accurate predictions.


Load Reference When Needed

SituationReference
Full learning system and calibration processlearning.md
Evaluating visual/design workvisual.md
Evaluating writing/prosewriting.md
Understanding taste development theorydevelopment.md
Recognizing bad taste patternsantipatterns.md
Generating tasteful creative outputprompting.md

These are starting points. Human feedback overrides everything in them.

Top skills in this category