Taste
Develop refined aesthetic judgment by learning from human feedback, asking genuine questions about quality, and calibrating over time.
Iván
@ivangdavila
What This Skill Does
An AI skill that learns aesthetic judgment by asking specific questions about quality, recording human corrections, and extracting patterns to calibrate its taste over time. It stores corrections, preferences, and patterns in a structured workspace.
Replaces relying on static rules or generic AI taste by building a personalized, continuously refined aesthetic sense through direct human feedback.
When to Use It
- Ask for feedback on a design or writing sample to improve your own judgment
- Record a correction when an AI's aesthetic evaluation misses the mark
- Calibrate the AI's taste in a new domain like visual design or prose
- Extract a generalizable pattern from a specific taste correction
- Check the AI's current confidence level before relying on its aesthetic opinion
Install
$ openclaw skills install @ivangdavila/tasteCore Principle — Learn From the Human
You don't have taste yet. The human does. Your job is to:
- Ask when you don't understand why something is good/bad
- Record every correction and explanation
- Apply learned patterns to future judgments
- Check your judgments against the human's until calibrated
Taste is learned through exposure + feedback. The human provides both.
Workspace
Store taste learning in ~/taste/:
- corrections/ — Each time human corrects your judgment
- preferences/ — Human's stated aesthetic preferences by domain
- patterns/ — Extracted rules from accumulated corrections
- calibration.md — Current confidence level per domain
The Learning Loop
When evaluating anything aesthetic:
- State your judgment — "I think X because Y"
- Ask for feedback — "Does this match your taste? What am I missing?"
- If corrected:
- Ask WHY (genuinely curious, not defensive)
- Record the correction with context
- Extract the underlying pattern
- Update your calibration confidence
Never defend your aesthetic judgment against the human's. Learn from the gap.
Genuine Curiosity Protocol
When the human says something is better/worse than you thought:
Ask specifically:
- "What makes this work better than the alternative?"
- "What am I not seeing here?"
- "Is this a general principle or specific to this context?"
- "Would this apply to [similar situation]?"
Don't ask vaguely:
- ❌ "Can you explain more?"
- ❌ "Why do you think that?"
Specific questions show you're trying to extract transferable knowledge.
Recording Corrections
When human corrects your taste judgment:
Date: [timestamp]
Domain: [design/writing/etc]
My judgment: [what I said]
Human's correction: [what they said]
Why (their explanation): [the reasoning]
Pattern extracted: [generalizable rule]
Confidence update: [how this changes my calibration]
Store in corrections/[domain]/[date].md
Calibration Levels
Track your confidence per domain:
| Level | Meaning | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Uncalibrated | No feedback yet | Always ask, never assert |
| Learning | Some corrections received | State tentatively, ask for confirmation |
| Calibrating | Patterns emerging | State with reasoning, check occasionally |
| Calibrated | Consistent agreement | State confidently, still open to correction |
Start uncalibrated in every domain. Earn confidence through accurate predictions.
Load Reference When Needed
| Situation | Reference |
|---|---|
| Full learning system and calibration process | learning.md |
| Evaluating visual/design work | visual.md |
| Evaluating writing/prose | writing.md |
| Understanding taste development theory | development.md |
| Recognizing bad taste patterns | antipatterns.md |
| Generating tasteful creative output | prompting.md |
These are starting points. Human feedback overrides everything in them.
Top skills in this category
Self-Improving + Proactive Agent
@ivangdavilaSelf-reflection + Self-criticism + Self-learning + Self-organizing memory. Agent evaluates its own work, catches mistakes, and improves permanently. Use when...
ontology
@oswalpalashTyped knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills. Use when creating/querying entities (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document), linkin...
Humanizer
@biostartechnologyRemove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Obsidian
@steipeteWork with Obsidian vaults (plain Markdown notes) and automate via obsidian-cli.
YouTube Watcher
@michaelgatharaFetch and read transcripts from YouTube videos. Use when you need to summarize a video, answer questions about its content, or extract information from it.