memory-handoff
Use at the end of any session that discovered durable knowledge (architecture decisions, root causes, setup gotchas, workflow changes, security findings, reusable patterns), or whe…
Solomon Neas
@solomonneas
Install
$ openclaw skills install @solomonneas/memory-handoffmemory-handoff
Coding sessions die with their transcripts. A memory handoff is a short structured note that a memory owner (a long-lived agent, a teammate, or future you) can review and file into durable memory. This skill pairs with brigade, which lints and ingests handoffs, but works standalone.
In a Brigade-wired repo the handoff is the closing gate of the Brigade process model. This skill owns the handoff itself: format, quality bar, routing sections, and lint.
When a handoff is warranted
Durable knowledge only: architecture decisions, non-obvious root causes, environment gotchas, workflow changes, security findings, reusable commands or patterns, user preferences, research findings. Not task chatter, not anything the repo already records (code, git history, existing docs).
Where to write it
- If the repo has a brigade inbox (check
.brigade/config) or an existing handoff dir (.claude/memory-handoffs/,.codex/memory-handoffs/), write there. - Otherwise create
.claude/memory-handoffs/and write there.
Filename: YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-<slug>.md
Format
# Memory Handoff
## Type
setup | workflow | bugfix | decision | security | preference | research | project-context
## Title
Short, specific title
## Summary
2 to 4 sentences. What happened and why it matters.
## Durable facts
- Fact 1
- Fact 2
## Evidence
- files changed: ...
- commands run: ...
- error strings: ...
## Recommended memory action
create-card | update-card | no-card
## Target card
descriptive-card-name.md
## Suggested card content
(the exact card to save; MUST start with YAML frontmatter)
brigade handoff lint requires the routing sections: Recommended memory action is mandatory, and for create-card/update-card the suggested card content must begin with YAML frontmatter. For no-card, replace the card sections with ## Target document and ## Suggested document content instead. When unsure of the destination system's exact expectations, scaffold with brigade handoff draft and fill it in.
Quality bar
- Durable, not session fluff. If it will not matter in a month, do not write it.
- Specific and verifiable. Exact paths, exact commands, exact error strings.
- Under 400 words. The reviewer should route it without rethinking the session.
- One handoff per distinct piece of knowledge. Two unrelated discoveries are two files.
- Convert relative dates ("yesterday", "last week") to absolute dates.
Verify
If the brigade CLI is installed, run brigade handoff lint on the repo and fix what it flags. If not, re-read the handoff asking: could someone who was not in this session act on this?
Common mistakes
- Writing a session narrative instead of extracted facts. The reviewer needs the knowledge, not the story.
- Skipping the handoff because the session "was mostly debugging". Root causes are the single most valuable handoff type.
- Editing the memory owner's canonical files directly instead of handing off. The handoff flow exists so a reviewer can veto.
Top skills in this category
self-improving agent
@pskoettCaptures and maintains learnings, errors, and corrections. Use when a command fails, the user corrects an assumption, a capability is missing, knowledge is outdated, or a better approach is found. Review relevant saved guidance before major tasks, reuse, and promotion; revalidate it according to wha
Self-Improving + Proactive Agent
@ivangdavilaSelf-reflection + Self-criticism + Self-learning + Self-organizing memory. Agent evaluates its own work, catches mistakes, and improves permanently. Use when...
ontology
@oswalpalashTyped knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills. Use when creating/querying entities (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document), linkin...
Humanizer
@biostartechnologyRemove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Obsidian
@steipeteWork with Obsidian vaults (plain Markdown notes) and automate via obsidian-cli.