Preprint
Reinforcement Learning

Model-based reinforcement learning: A survey

January 1, 2023

0

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2023

Year

Abstract

… Categories of Model-based Reinforcement Learning To properly define model-based reinforcement learning, we first need individual definitions of planning and reinforcement learning. …

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) holds the promise of sample-efficient learning by leveraging a learned model of the environment, in contrast to model-free methods that require extensive interaction. This survey is timely as MBRL has seen a resurgence with advances in deep learning, yet the field lacks a unified framework. By providing clear definitions and a taxonomy, the paper helps researchers navigate the diverse landscape of MBRL methods, from Dyna-style algorithms to world models and planning-based approaches.

The survey's emphasis on categorizing MBRL is crucial for both newcomers and experts. It clarifies the relationship between planning and learning, which is often blurred in practice. This clarity can accelerate progress by enabling researchers to identify gaps and opportunities, and by providing a common language for comparing methods.

Technical Contributions

  • Formal Definitions: The paper rigorously defines model-based RL, distinguishing it from model-free RL and planning, which is essential for consistent terminology.
  • Taxonomy of Approaches: It categorizes MBRL methods into distinct classes, such as those using learned models for planning, for policy optimization, or for data augmentation, providing a structured overview.
  • Synthesis of Recent Advances: The survey covers recent deep learning-based MBRL methods, including world models and latent-space planning, highlighting their innovations.
  • Discussion of Challenges: It identifies key challenges such as model bias, uncertainty quantification, and the compounding error problem, which are central to MBRL research.

Results

As a survey, the paper does not introduce new experimental results. Instead, it aggregates findings from the literature, noting that model-based methods often achieve higher sample efficiency than model-free counterparts, but may suffer from performance degradation due to model inaccuracies. The survey points to hybrid approaches that combine model-based and model-free elements as a promising direction to mitigate these issues.

Significance

This survey is likely to become a key reference for the RL community, similar to earlier surveys on deep reinforcement learning. By organizing the field, it can help standardize research efforts and encourage the adoption of MBRL in real-world applications where sample efficiency is critical, such as robotics and autonomous systems. The taxonomy may also inspire new hybrid methods that leverage the strengths of both model-based and model-free paradigms, potentially leading to more robust and generalizable AI agents.