Why I'm building a free, open-source AWS emulator — Stable…
    Neura MarketNeura Market/Stable Diffusion
    ChatGPTChatGPTClaudeClaudeGeminiGeminiCursorCursorGrokGrokPerplexityPerplexityStable DiffusionStable Diffusion
    DeepSeekDeepSeekCoPilotCoPilotMidjourneyMidjourney
    View All Directories
    OverviewPromptsBlogVideosGuidesCoursesCommunityModelsLoRAsComfyUI WorkflowsTrending
    Stable DiffusionBlogWhy I'm building a free, open-source AWS emulator
    Back to Blog
    Why I'm building a free, open-source AWS emulator
    aws

    Why I'm building a free, open-source AWS emulator

    Lucas Vieira April 6, 2026
    0 views

    LocalStack went proprietary. Our builds broke. So I built a free, open-source replacement in Rust — 13 AWS services, 983 API operations, 100% conformance.


    title: Why I'm building a free, open-source AWS emulator published: true description: LocalStack went proprietary. Our builds broke. So I built a free, open-source replacement in Rust — 13 AWS services, 983 API operations, 100% conformance. tags: aws, rust, testing, opensource canonical_url: https://fakecloud.dev/blog/why-fakecloud/

    published_at: 2026-04-06 22:26 +0000


    A few days ago, our CI started failing. The culprit: localstack:latest now requires an account and an auth token. Broken builds.

    I'd seen LocalStack creeping toward proprietary for a while, but this was the moment it actually hit. A colleague noticed it at the same time as me, but I was already working on a fix. I patched the build, but the question stuck: how long can we keep using the old version until we start having real problems?

    I don't trust mocks

    I should back up. I care about tests a lot. Enough to become a maintainer of Chai.js. Enough that when I build something, the test infrastructure comes first.

    But I have a specific opinion about what kind of tests matter. I hate mocks. Not the concept — the way most codebases use them. You end up with tests that don't test anything real. You're asserting that you call functions in the right order. You're verifying the plumbing, not the behavior.

    The worst part is when mocked tests give you false confidence. I've seen tests that assert you do the wrong thing successfully — the mock doesn't care, it just returns what you told it to. Your tests pass. Your code has a bug. You ship it.

    If you're building on AWS, you need integration tests that actually talk to something that behaves like AWS. Not a mock. Not a stub that returns 200 to everything. Something that implements the real behavior: if you call API A then API B, and AWS would produce side effect C, then your test environment should produce side effect C too.

    That's what LocalStack used to give us. And that's what I wanted to keep — but free and open source.

    So I built it

    I started fakecloud on April 4th, 2026. Three days later: 13 AWS services, 300+ commits, 1,000+ tests.

    That pace was possible because of two things. First, I used LLMs heavily throughout — not to generate code I don't understand, but as a force multiplier with strong guardrails. Every feature ships with E2E tests. The tests are the guardrails. If the LLM generates something that doesn't match real AWS behavior, the tests catch it.

    Second, Rust. I chose Rust because I love static-typed compiled languages, and Rust's type system is genuinely amazing. You get the performance of no garbage collector without having to manually manage memory. It means fakecloud starts in under 100ms and runs as a single binary — no Docker required, no runtime dependencies.

    Correctness is the whole point

    fakecloud doesn't try to be a scalable production cloud. It's not that. It's a testing tool. And the one thing a testing tool needs to get right is correctness.

    What does that mean in practice? If you call CreateQueue, then SendMessage, then ReceiveMessage on real AWS and get back your message with specific attributes — fakecloud should do exactly the same thing. If it doesn't, that's a fakecloud bug.

    We currently verify this with 280+ E2E tests that use the official aws-sdk-rust crate and 34,856 auto-generated conformance test variants validated against official AWS Smithy models — covering all 983 API operations across 13 services at 100% conformance. The plan for the near future: set up a real AWS account and run our test suite against both fakecloud and real AWS side by side, so we can verify behavioral parity automatically.

    What's here today

    13 services, 983 API operations, all open source, all free:

    • S3 (107 actions) — objects, multipart uploads, versioning, lifecycle, notifications, encryption
    • SQS (23 actions) — FIFO queues, dead-letter queues, long polling, batch operations
    • SNS (34 actions) — fan-out to SQS, HTTP delivery, filter policies, platform applications
    • EventBridge (57 actions) — pattern matching, scheduled rules, connections, API destinations, endpoints
    • IAM (128 actions) — users, roles, policies, groups, instance profiles, OIDC/SAML providers
    • STS (11 actions) — assume role, session tokens, federation, credential expiration
    • SSM (146 actions) — parameters, documents, commands, maintenance windows, associations, automation, sessions
    • DynamoDB (57 actions) — tables, items, transactions, PartiQL, backups, global tables, streaming
    • Lambda (10 actions) — function CRUD, invoke, event source mappings
    • Secrets Manager (23 actions) — versioning, soft delete, rotation, replication, resource policies
    • CloudWatch Logs (113 actions) — groups, streams, filtering, deliveries, transformers, anomaly detection
    • KMS (53 actions) — encryption, aliases, key management, grants, custom key stores
    • CloudFormation (8 actions) — template parsing, resource provisioning

    Services talk to each other: S3 notifications deliver to SNS/SQS. SNS fans out to SQS. EventBridge rules fire on schedule and deliver to targets. This is the kind of cross-service behavior that matters in integration tests and that most emulators get wrong or skip entirely.

    Try it

    curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/faiscadev/fakecloud/main/install.sh | bash
    fakecloud
    

    Then point any AWS SDK at http://localhost:4566 with dummy credentials. That's it.

    The code is at github.com/faiscadev/fakecloud. It's AGPL-3.0 — free and open source, including for commercial use.

    If you need a local AWS emulator for your integration tests, give it a try. And if something doesn't behave like real AWS — open an issue. That's a bug, and we'll fix it.

    Tags

    awsrusttestingopensource

    Comments

    More Blog

    View all
    Context bankruptcy: The case for strategic forgetting for AI Agentsai

    Context bankruptcy: The case for strategic forgetting for AI Agents

    Most of us have seen a coding agent fail to complete a task we know it can do. We just don't...

    J
    James O'Reilly
    Parallel Compliance Engine: Drive-to-Sheets Multi-Agent Orchestrationgooglecloud

    Parallel Compliance Engine: Drive-to-Sheets Multi-Agent Orchestration

    When building Generative AI applications, developers often encounter a massive bottleneck: sequential...

    A
    Aryan Irani
    Is It Ethical to Post and Ask About Circuits on Dev.to?discuss

    Is It Ethical to Post and Ask About Circuits on Dev.to?

    I’ve been thinking about sharing some electronic circuit posts on Dev.to — small circuits, DIY...

    C
    codebunny20
    The One-Click Exporter: AI Studio Antigravity, Probed to Its Limitsagents

    The One-Click Exporter: AI Studio Antigravity, Probed to Its Limits

    What nobody tells you about exporting your multi-agent prototype to a local workspace. Every...

    L
    leslysandra
    Guarding the till while autonomous data agents do the diggingagenticarchitect

    Guarding the till while autonomous data agents do the digging

    Autonomous agents are genuinely good at answering messy business questions. Give one an LLM and a set...

    S
    Sireesha Pulipati
    Return on Attention: Why AI Code Reviews Are Wearing Us Outai

    Return on Attention: Why AI Code Reviews Are Wearing Us Out

    PR volume went up, ticket quality didn't, and the gap got filled with LLMs on both sides of the review: bots reviewing, bots replying, bots occasionally arguing with bots about priorities that only existed in a teammate's head. Our CEO named the actual problem, and it's bigger than code review.

    C
    christine

    Stay up to date

    Get the latest Stable Diffusion prompts, rules, and resources delivered to your inbox weekly.

    Neura Market LogoNeura Market

    Discover the best AI prompts, plugins, and resources for Stable Diffusion and more.

    Content Types

    • Rules
    • Prompts
    • MCPs
    • Agents
    • Guides

    Platforms

    • ChatGPT Directory
    • Claude Directory
    • Gemini Directory
    • Cursor Directory
    • Grok Directory
    • Perplexity Directory
    • DeepSeek Directory
    • CoPilot Directory
    • Stable Diffusion Directory
    • Midjourney Directory
    • All Directories

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Documentation
    • Help Center
    • Marketplace

    Legal

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service

    © 2026 Neura Market. All rights reserved.

    |

    Not affiliated with any AI platform vendors.

    Ready-made automations for this

    Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Stable Diffusion resource

    • Image Replacement and PDF Download Workflow for Google Docsn8n · $14.99 · Related topic
    • Dynamic Image Replacement for Google Slides via Webhookn8n · $13.64 · Related topic
    • Create a WHOIS API Interface for AI Agents with 8 Domain Management Operationsn8n · Free · Related topic
    Browse all workflows