Giving AI agents knowledge they were never trained on —…
    Neura MarketNeura Market/Stable Diffusion
    ChatGPTChatGPTClaudeClaudeGeminiGeminiCursorCursorGrokGrokPerplexityPerplexityStable DiffusionStable Diffusion
    DeepSeekDeepSeekCoPilotCoPilotMidjourneyMidjourney
    View All Directories
    OverviewPromptsBlogVideosGuidesCoursesCommunityModelsLoRAsComfyUI WorkflowsTrending
    Stable DiffusionBlogGiving AI agents knowledge they were never trained on
    Back to Blog
    Giving AI agents knowledge they were never trained on
    mcp

    Giving AI agents knowledge they were never trained on

    Jonas Gauffin May 14, 2026
    0 views

    I love coding my own stuff, and my clients typically have lots of internal specifications and...


    title: "Giving AI agents knowledge they were never trained on" published: true tags: mcp, ai, typescript, llm

    I love coding my own stuff, and my clients typically have lots of internal specifications and libraries to use.

    But since LLMs haven't been trained on that, it's hard to get them to code accurately using those specs, libraries, or frameworks.

    You can, of course, let the agents parse everything, but that wastes tokens and your patience :)

    The same goes for well-known libraries, but you are stuck on a specific version that you must follow. You don't want it to guess the API.

    docs-mcpserver exists to deal with both.

    What it is

    It is an MCP server that provides an agent with accurate knowledge of a framework or specification using documentation as the medium. It reads three kinds of docs:

    • Markdown docs — your *.md files.
    • API reference — C# XML documentation, or TypeDoc JSON.
    • Schema — JSON Schema, OpenAPI 3.x, Swagger 2.0.

    What the agent gets out of it is the same in every case: the real names, the real signatures, the real shapes. Sources can come from a local folder or straight from a GitHub URL. A single server instance can host several libraries side by side. For instance, your in-house framework, a client's framework, and a specific version of some public library.

    The agent picks which one to query.

    I personally have used it to code against a specification called DATEX (traffic information for roads), which is HUGE, my own SPA library, and against sound format specifications for a sound app I'm building.

    Why not just give the agent the files

    You could point the agent to the folders and let it read them. The MCP server does a few things that raw file access does not:

    • It is sandboxed. Each source is scoped, with path-traversal protection. The agent reads what you exposed, nothing else on the disk.
    • It reads in pieces. Instead of loading a 4000-line reference file, the agent asks for the table of contents, then pulls the one chapter it needs.
    • It searches properly. Dedicated search tools with regex and glob support, instead of the agent improvising its own grep.
    • It is self-describing. With several libraries configured, the agent calls one tool to discover what is available. You do not have to spell out every path.
    • GitHub works without cloning. Give it a repo URL and it handles the rest.

    The multi-library part is the point. Instead of running several MCP servers for documentation, you get one with a small toolset. No token waste.

    Setting it up

    Install and build:

    npm install
    npm run build
    

    The quick way, a single folder:

    docs-mcpserver ./docs --name "My Docs"
    

    For the real use case — several libraries — use a config file. Here is an in-house framework served from disk, next to a pinned version of a public library pulled from GitHub:

    {
      "name": "dev-docs",
      "description": "Frameworks the model has not been trained on",
      "cacheDir": "./cache",
      "libraries": [
        {
          "name": "acme-core",
          "description": "Our internal application framework",
          "sources": [
            { "type": "disk", "origin": "./frameworks/acme-core/docs", "kind": "docs" },
            { "type": "disk", "origin": "./frameworks/acme-core/api",  "kind": "api"  }
          ]
        },
        {
          "name": "somelib-3.2",
          "description": "SomeLib, pinned to v3.2.0",
          "sources": [
            {
              "type": "github",
              "origin": "https://github.com/someorg/somelib/tree/v3.2.0/docs",
              "kind": "docs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
    

    Start it with the config:

    docs-mcpserver --config dev-docs.json
    

    And register it with Claude Code:

    claude mcp add mydocs -- node /path/to/markdown-docs-mcp/dist/index.js --config /path/to/dev-docs.json
    

    For private GitHub repos, set GITHUB_TOKEN in the environment.

    What the agent actually sees

    Each library exposes tools based on the kind of its sources:

    • docs — get_doc_index, get_sub_index, read_doc_file, get_file_toc, get_chapters, search_docs.
    • api — get_api_index, get_api_type, get_api_member, search_api.
    • schema — list_schemas, list_definitions, get_definition, search_definitions, search_all_schemas.

    A typical run looks like this. The agent calls list_libraries and sees acme-core and somelib-3.2. It needs to know how acme-core handles configuration, so it calls search_docs with library: "acme-core", finds the right file, asks for its table of contents with get_file_toc, then pulls the one relevant section with get_chapters. It answers the question without ever loading the whole file.

    When multiple libraries are configured, every tool takes a library parameter. When there is only one, the parameter disappears, and the tools behave like a plain single-library server.

    The same applies to schema sources. For an OpenAPI spec, path operations show up as definitions named like GET /pets, so the agent can ask for one endpoint without reading the whole document. Useful when you want the agent to call your API correctly rather than guess at the shape of it.

    Generating the API input

    One thing worth knowing up front: the api pipeline does not read source code. It consumes a generated documentation file.

    • TypeScript / JavaScript — use TypeDoc's JSON serializer: typedoc --json api.json src/index.ts. Point the source at that .json file. The markdown output from typedoc-plugin-markdown is not supported — it has to be the JSON serializer output.
    • C# — enable <GenerateDocumentationFile>true</GenerateDocumentationFile> and point the source at the generated *.xml file, or the build output folder that contains it.

    What it does not do

    It does not read source code. If you want API reference, you generate the doc file first, as above.

    Try it

    The code is on GitHub, or on npm as docs-mcpserver.

    Feel free to leave feedback, or check my other MCP servers on GitHub.

    Tags

    mcpaitypescriptllm

    Comments

    More Blog

    View all
    Context bankruptcy: The case for strategic forgetting for AI Agentsai

    Context bankruptcy: The case for strategic forgetting for AI Agents

    Most of us have seen a coding agent fail to complete a task we know it can do. We just don't...

    J
    James O'Reilly
    Parallel Compliance Engine: Drive-to-Sheets Multi-Agent Orchestrationgooglecloud

    Parallel Compliance Engine: Drive-to-Sheets Multi-Agent Orchestration

    When building Generative AI applications, developers often encounter a massive bottleneck: sequential...

    A
    Aryan Irani
    Is It Ethical to Post and Ask About Circuits on Dev.to?discuss

    Is It Ethical to Post and Ask About Circuits on Dev.to?

    I’ve been thinking about sharing some electronic circuit posts on Dev.to — small circuits, DIY...

    C
    codebunny20
    The One-Click Exporter: AI Studio Antigravity, Probed to Its Limitsagents

    The One-Click Exporter: AI Studio Antigravity, Probed to Its Limits

    What nobody tells you about exporting your multi-agent prototype to a local workspace. Every...

    L
    leslysandra
    Guarding the till while autonomous data agents do the diggingagenticarchitect

    Guarding the till while autonomous data agents do the digging

    Autonomous agents are genuinely good at answering messy business questions. Give one an LLM and a set...

    S
    Sireesha Pulipati
    Return on Attention: Why AI Code Reviews Are Wearing Us Outai

    Return on Attention: Why AI Code Reviews Are Wearing Us Out

    PR volume went up, ticket quality didn't, and the gap got filled with LLMs on both sides of the review: bots reviewing, bots replying, bots occasionally arguing with bots about priorities that only existed in a teammate's head. Our CEO named the actual problem, and it's bigger than code review.

    C
    christine

    Stay up to date

    Get the latest Stable Diffusion prompts, rules, and resources delivered to your inbox weekly.

    Neura Market LogoNeura Market

    Discover the best AI prompts, plugins, and resources for Stable Diffusion and more.

    Content Types

    • Rules
    • Prompts
    • MCPs
    • Agents
    • Guides

    Platforms

    • ChatGPT Directory
    • Claude Directory
    • Gemini Directory
    • Cursor Directory
    • Grok Directory
    • Perplexity Directory
    • DeepSeek Directory
    • CoPilot Directory
    • Stable Diffusion Directory
    • Midjourney Directory
    • All Directories

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Documentation
    • Help Center
    • Marketplace

    Legal

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service

    © 2026 Neura Market. All rights reserved.

    |

    Not affiliated with any AI platform vendors.

    Ready-made automations for this

    Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Stable Diffusion resource

    • Telegram AI Chatbot with InfraNodus Knowledge Base Integrationn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    • Advanced Knowledge Base Chatbot with OpenAI and MongoDBn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    • Notion Knowledge Base AI Assistant for Enhanced Information Managementn8n · $19.99 · Related topic
    • Automated Knowledge Base Article Generation for Traveln8n · $19.99 · Related topic
    Browse all workflows