
Computer use is still the most engaging demo in AI today. Typing a request in plain language and then...
Computer use is still the most engaging demo in AI today. Typing a request in plain language and then seeing an agent independently navigate an obtuse website, test code end-to-end, or complete a form feels like witnessing an automated future. There's something off to me here, though.
Computer and browser use demos highlight a limitation in how we are currently designing AI interactions. There are undeniable engineering achievements behind browser and computer use models, workflows, and tools. But these workflows feel inherently retrofitted. They're an attempt to force a fundamentally new paradigm into a legacy form factor. Perhaps dramatically, it feels like the modern equivalent of tapping out text messages in Morse code.
For three years, typed chat has served as our default gateway to AI. I'm not convinced that typed chat will be the long-term interface for advanced intelligence. Using voice dictation to control computer use agents feels like a step in the correct direction. But forcing AI agents to mimic human mouse movements, keystrokes, and inputs is a temporary bridge rather than the final destination.
As the AI industry moves beyond initial adoption, new approaches to interface and interaction design should be a focus. As great as the demos are, I hope next year's frontier demos are wildly different from what we have today.
aiMost of us have seen a coding agent fail to complete a task we know it can do. We just don't...
googlecloudWhen building Generative AI applications, developers often encounter a massive bottleneck: sequential...
discussI’ve been thinking about sharing some electronic circuit posts on Dev.to — small circuits, DIY...
agentsWhat nobody tells you about exporting your multi-agent prototype to a local workspace. Every...
agenticarchitectAutonomous agents are genuinely good at answering messy business questions. Give one an LLM and a set...
aiPR volume went up, ticket quality didn't, and the gap got filled with LLMs on both sides of the review: bots reviewing, bots replying, bots occasionally arguing with bots about priorities that only existed in a teammate's head. Our CEO named the actual problem, and it's bigger than code review.
Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Stable Diffusion resource