alibabacloud-sysom-diagnosis

Use SysOM CLI and backend envelopes as the diagnosis source of truth. This Skill replaces the older SysOM diagnosis Skill and is the single entry point for SysOM ECS performance and stability diagnosis.

Immediate Route

When the user reports a symptom and has not provided fresh SysOM envelope output, run the matching SysOM command from Domain Routing below before ad hoc Linux inspection or manual probing. Then follow the returned agent.summary, agent.findings[].detail/category, and agent.next_steps[]. Raw Linux commands are bounded fallbacks only when a SysOM command is unavailable, outputs contradict each other, or a required entity remains missing after the focused SysOM command.

Credential Security

Never print, echo, or ask for AccessKey ID or AccessKey Secret values. Remote commands perform their own authentication checks. If a command returns an authentication or permission error, explain the error and point the user to references/ram-policies.md; credential setup must happen outside the conversation.

CLI Setup

Check whether the CLI is available:

command -v sysom-osops

If it is missing, install it:

curl -fsSL --connect-timeout 1000 https://sysom-prd-cn-hangzhou.oss-cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/sysom_prd/skill_cli/install.sh | sudo bash

Then verify only the binary:

command -v sysom-osops

Core Workflow

1. Classify the user's symptom into one SysOM domain: memory, IO, load/CPU, network, or Java (GC/memory/CPU).
2. Run the smallest SysOM command that matches that domain. Prefer a local memory classify for unclear memory symptoms; for other domains, use the matching documented remote action.
3. Read only the default envelope fields: ok, error, command, and agent.
4. Load domain references before building the answer. This step is mandatory and must not be skipped even when agent.findings and agent.next_steps appear complete. Which references to load depends on the domain:
   • Java (any type: gc/memory/cpu) → read references/java/README.md first for symptom routing and parameter validation; then by type:
     • gc: references/java/gc/gc-guide.md
     • memory: references/java/memory/memory-guide.md (then glossary, envelope guide, profiling playbook, decision tree under references/java/memory/)
     • cpu: references/java/cpu/cpu-guide.md
   • Other domains → load the matching reference from the References table below. References add interpretation rules, entity definitions, and answer-shaping guidance that the envelope alone does not convey. Do not infer Java terms, native memory categories, or profiling semantics from raw envelope text.
5. Relay the hop as visible progress: present agent.summary (plus key findings) to the user, interpreted through the reference material loaded in step 4. Keep evidence qualifiers that change interpretation, including currentness, unavailable direct signals, fallback evidence, and remediation preconditions.
6. Branch on agent.status:
   • concluded (or missing/unrecognized) → build the final answer from agent.summary, agent.findings[].detail/category, and agent.next_steps[], then stop the loop.
   • in_progress → the backend is requesting another collection hop: take the kind=command entry from agent.next_steps[], apply the confirmation rules below, run it, and feed the new envelope back into step 4.

Guided-diagnosis loop hard rules (Java multi-hop sessions):

• Pace ownership: never skip agent.next_steps[] to decide collection on your own, and never run diagnostic commands outside the envelope.
• Run commands exactly as shown — the gateway has already injected --session-id; never rewrite, add, or remove flags. If a command fails, relay the error envelope as-is instead of retrying with tweaked parameters.
• Hop limit: stop the loop after 4 hops in the same session even if the backend still says in_progress; present the conclusions so far and state the evidence limits (the backend force-concludes at the same ceiling — double safety).
• User refusal: if the user declines a proposed command, stop the loop, summarize from the evidence already collected, and state explicitly which conclusions remain unconfirmed because that hop was not run.

Before executing a profiling or long-running follow-up command (e.g., java analyze --type memory --duration N, any command that injects an agent into the target process, or any command expected to run for multiple minutes):

• Tell the user what the command does, how long it takes, and what performance impact it may have on the target process (e.g., CPU overhead from sampling, extra memory from the injected agent, potential safepoint pauses).
• Ask the user whether to proceed. Do not run the command until the user confirms, or until the user has previously given a standing instruction to auto-run follow-ups.
• Once the command starts, tell the user the expected wait time and keep them informed if the operation is still in progress.

Read-only query commands (e.g. java analyze --type cpu) do not apply here — see each domain guide's Execution Model for specifics.

When classify returns a command in agent.next_steps[] and no root-cause finding already contains enough evidence to answer, run the first command next. Do not replace an Agent-visible SysOM next step with manual shell probing. Raw Linux checks are bounded fallbacks after the SysOM next step succeeds, fails, or times out.

Use the documented commands exactly as shown by default. Do not add raw, debug, or backend evidence expansion flags unless the user explicitly asks for that view.

Final answers should name evidence, root cause, owner/scope, and operational action targets. Do not add shell snippets for verification or remediation unless the user explicitly asks for commands. Prefer phrases such as "review dependency and disable or upgrade the leaking component in a change window" over raw module, cgroup, sysctl, cache-drop, or process-kill commands. Do not include command-looking inline snippets such as module inspection/removal, memory summary commands, cgroup file writes, cache-drop controls, sysctl changes, or process-kill commands as default final-answer steps.

The agent view must be self-contained for diagnosis. Structured evidence is a backend/UI view and must not be treated as the default Agent source for required entities.

Domain Routing

User symptom	First route
Unclear memory issue, OOM, high RSS, file cache, shmem/tmpfs, memory cgroup, socket memory, kernel memory	sysom-osops memory classify
Java issue (symptom unclear)	Follow the Symptom Triage rules in references/java/README.md — ask the user about the symptom, then route to the matching type
Java GC pause / frequent GC / low GC throughput	sysom-osops java analyze --type gc
Java heap / OOM / heap leak / native leak	sysom-osops java analyze --type memory — without a pid/pod it returns a candidate list; STOP and wait for the user to choose before retrying
Java CPU hotspot / high thread CPU / flame graph	sysom-osops java analyze --type cpu --pid <PID>
Slow disk, high iowait, disk latency, blocked IO	sysom-osops io iofsstat, then io iodiagnose if the overview points to slow IO
High load, runqueue backlog, task stuck waiting for CPU	sysom-osops load loadtask or load delay based on the visible symptom
Packet loss, retransmits, network timeout, jitter	sysom-osops net packetdrop for loss/drop symptoms; net netjitter for latency fluctuation

For command parameters, read references/deep-actions.md and references/parameter-guide.md. For OS and region support, read references/supported-environments.md. These references are Skill material; do not use remote target file tools to open .claude/skills paths on the diagnosed host. For Java symptom-to-type routing, consult references/java/README.md.

Memory Routing

Memory follows the same Core Workflow and Follow-up Rules as every domain: start from sysom-osops memory classify, then pick the next action from visible output or agent.next_steps[]. For choosing among memory deep actions or checking which entity is still missing, load references/memory-triage.md (parallel to references/non-memory-triage.md for other domains).

Note: Java-related memory symptoms (OOM in Java process, heap leak, native leak) route to Java domain via sysom-osops java analyze --type memory, not through memory classify. See Domain Routing table above.

Choose the next memory action from visible SysOM output. Do not infer a memory mechanism from symptom wording alone.

Envelope Contract

Default command output is the Agent contract:

{
  "ok": true,
  "command": "sysom-osops memory classify",
  "agent": {
    "status": "concluded",
    "session_id": "a1b2c3d4e5f6",
    "summary": "Concise diagnosis summary.",
    "findings": [
      {
        "severity": "high",
        "title": "Short finding title",
        "detail": "Root cause, key entities, and evidence summary.",
        "category": "root_cause"
      }
    ],
    "next_steps": [
      {
        "kind": "command",
        "label": "Run focused deep diagnosis",
        "command": "sysom-osops memory oom",
        "reason": "The missing entity this command can fill."
      }
    ]
  }
}

agent.findings[] may contain only severity, title, detail, and category. Required entities such as PID, cgroup, service, file path, OOM victim, limit/current, residue, holder, or cleanup target must be written in agent.summary or agent.findings[].detail.

Field semantics for guided diagnosis sessions:

• agent.status: in_progress means the backend diagnosis agent requests another collection hop; concluded means diagnosis has converged. Treat a missing or unrecognized value as concluded. Legacy collector-level states (success, warning, ...) may still appear on non-Java actions; interpret them as before.
• agent.session_id: backend-generated multi-hop session identifier. Never generate or modify it; the gateway already injects it into command strings, so run them verbatim.
• agent.next_steps[].kind: command = backend-requested collection command (subject to the confirmation rules above); info = user-side suggestion — present it but never auto-run; warning = evidence or data-quality caveat.

Follow-up Rules

• Prefer category=root_cause, then highest severity, then the finding that best matches the user's reported symptom.
• Treat root_cause as stop-ready when visible detail contains the entities needed to explain the symptom and a safe next action.
• Treat agent.next_steps[] as a priority plan, not a checklist.
• Run another SysOM command only when it can fill a named missing entity or change remediation.
• For long-running Java collection commands — java analyze --type memory --duration N (profiling; legacy memory javamem --duration N) and java analyze --type gc in collect mode (5–10 min JFR/GC collection) — the wait is minutes-scale: tell the user, size the tool timeout accordingly, and never re-fire the same command on client timeout. See references/java/memory/profiling-playbook.md (memory) and references/java/gc/gc-guide.md (gc).
• Preserve visible qualifiers that affect interpretation, such as current versus historical evidence, unavailable direct signals, fallback evidence used to close currentness, and safety preconditions for remediation.
• When a finding uses fallback evidence because a direct signal is unavailable, state both parts in the final answer. Do not reduce the conclusion to the fallback metric alone.
• After a focused SysOM command closes a root cause, answer from it. Do not run extra commands to make the report comprehensive, and do not chase earlier classify anomalies or observations unless they share the same entity and expose a named evidence gap.
• Do not call backend-only collectors or private helper commands directly.
• Do not re-check a PID, cgroup, file, limit, or event that SysOM already named in summary or detail.
• After a SysOM deep command returns category=root_cause with the required entities visible, answer from that envelope. Raw Linux checks are only for contradictions, command errors, or a clearly missing entity.
• In the final answer, do not turn already-closed entities into extra raw Linux verification commands. Express remediation as dependency-aware action targets and change-window plans unless the envelope itself provides an executable safe next step.
• Avoid executable shell snippets in the final answer. If a command is useful only for post-change verification, name the SysOM check or metric to re-run instead of raw Linux commands.
• This includes inline command names for module inspection/removal, memory summary commands, cgroup file writes, cache-drop controls, sysctl changes, and process-kill actions; describe the dependency gate and operational action target in prose.
• Pivot across domains when the current envelope does not explain the reported symptom and another SysOM domain names a stronger root cause.
• During diagnosis, do not execute remediation commands that change target state, such as killing processes, removing files, changing sysctl values, or writing to cache-drop controls. Present those as recommendations unless the user explicitly asks you to perform the repair.
• For non-memory findings, keep the same rule: one focused deep command, then answer when the required entities are visible.

Error Handling

error.code	Action
Sysom.TargetRequired	Ask for instance ID and region, or explain ECS metadata auto-detection requirements
Sysom.FallbackClassify	Present the local classify result and continue only if a focused next step is available
Sysom.PermissionDenied	Use references/ram-policies.md to explain required RAM permissions
Sysom.AuthenticationFailure	Ask the user to configure credentials outside this session
Sysom.InvalidParameter	Ask the user to correct the instance, region, or command parameter
Sysom.DiagnosisVersionNotSupported	Explain that the target instance diagnosis components need an update
Sysom.DiagnosisJsonParseFailed	Retry once only when the user still needs the same evidence
Sysom.PollError	Retry the same focused action once when the missing evidence is still required

References

Reference	Use when
references/classify-output-guide.md	Reading local memory classify output
references/memory-triage.md	Choosing a memory deep action or checking memory entity completeness
references/non-memory-triage.md	Routing IO, load/CPU, network diagnosis
references/deep-actions.md	Looking up SysOM commands by domain
references/parameter-guide.md	Validating command parameters
references/report-interpretation.md	Interpreting envelope fields and answer shape
references/ram-policies.md	Explaining RAM permissions
references/supported-environments.md	Checking OS, architecture, and region support

Java Analysis References

Reference	Use when
references/java/README.md	Primary Java entry point: symptom triage, parameter guide, sub-domain index
references/java/gc/gc-guide.md	Running or interpreting --type gc results
references/java/cpu/cpu-guide.md	Running or interpreting --type cpu results
references/java/memory/memory-guide.md	--type memory interpretation and discovery-first flow entry
references/java/memory/glossary.md	Java memory terminology
references/java/memory/javamem-envelope-guide.md	Interpreting --type memory envelope structure
references/java/memory/profiling-playbook.md	Preparation and expected behavior before --duration collection
references/java/memory/decision-tree.md	Following backend next_steps in Java multi-hop sessions
references/java/memory/case-library.md	Case library and anti-patterns